From: Ulf Samuelsson <ulf.samuelsson@ericsson.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <dcbw@redhat.com>, <netdev@emagii.com>,
<hannes@stressinduktion.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: netlink NETLINK_ROUTE failure & Can the kernel really handle IPv6 properly
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 13:25:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54327C1C.7060808@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141003.114949.826855678619123407.davem@davemloft.net>
On 10/03/2014 08:49 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ulf Samuelsson <ulf.samuelsson@ericsson.com>
> Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 09:59:39 +0200
>
>> The kernel module is a control module which collects information
>> both from the kernel and from H/W, and talks to a userspace interface
>> manager.
>>
>> There is a proprietary management application which is used to
>> configure the stack.
>> This talks to the interface manager to handle different operations for
>> IPv6.
>>
>> The kernel module needs to know when interfaces are ready to use,
>> I.E: know when it exits "tentative" mode to do its job properly,
>> so the kernel module has to listen for RTM_NEWADDR.
>>
>> In a simpler system, your approach would be OK.
> Sorry, we're not going to help you with a proprietary driver
> of this kind.
>
> They should really just follow our upstream efforts to design
> a usable kernel framework for bridge and routing hardware offloads.
Whether to use a kernel framework or not is not my decision,
and I don't even work with that code.
What should interest the community is that a lot of stuff is probably
not working properly, when IPv6 link-local addresses are used.
Listening for NETDEV_UP, which is used in many places in the kernel,
seems incorrect,
since connection to the link-local address will fail until the
link-local address is verified.
It is not immediately obvious, since after 1-2 seconds the problem
disappears.
For that, listening to the RTM_NEWADDR seems mandatory, so
any framework would benefit from a solution as well.
Best Regards,
Ulf Samuelsson
'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-06 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-01 20:28 netlink NETLINK_ROUTE failure & Can the kernel really handle IPv6 properly Ulf Samuelsson
2014-10-01 21:30 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-10-02 12:38 ` Ulf samuelsson
2014-10-02 15:44 ` Dan Williams
2014-10-03 5:59 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2014-10-03 7:59 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2014-10-03 18:49 ` David Miller
2014-10-06 11:25 ` Ulf Samuelsson [this message]
2014-10-06 3:35 ` Gao feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54327C1C.7060808@ericsson.com \
--to=ulf.samuelsson@ericsson.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=netdev@emagii.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.