From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 88CAEE00877; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 07:04:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URIBL_RHS_DOB autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 1.5 URIBL_RHS_DOB Contains an URI of a new domain (Day Old Bread) * [URIs: ge.com] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [67.231.157.48 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mx0b-00176a03.pphosted.com (mx0b-00176a03.pphosted.com [67.231.157.48]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364DEE00853 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 07:04:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0048300.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0048300.ppops.net-00176a03. (8.14.7/8.14.7) with SMTP id s97E3w3b041190 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 10:04:30 -0400 Received: from cinmlip10.e2k.ad.ge.com ([12.71.149.1]) by m0048300.ppops.net-00176a03. with ESMTP id 1pvh4h80sk-21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 10:04:30 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO ALPMBHT01.e2k.ad.ge.com) ([3.159.19.194]) by cinmlip10.e2k.ad.ge.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 07 Oct 2014 10:00:59 -0400 Received: from CINMBAPD03.e2k.ad.ge.com (3.159.212.69) by ALPMBHT01.e2k.ad.ge.com (3.159.19.194) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 10:04:13 -0400 Received: from [3.26.68.158] (3.159.212.192) by CINMBAPD03.e2k.ad.ge.com (3.159.212.69) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.195.1; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 10:04:12 -0400 Message-ID: <5433F2DA.60300@ge.com> Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 15:04:10 +0100 From: "Carr, Chris (GE Intelligent Platforms)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Burton, Ross" References: <542945DD.2010800@ge.com> <5433BE53.8000108@ge.com> In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [3.159.212.192] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.12.52, 1.0.28, 0.0.0000 definitions=2014-10-07_05:2014-10-07, 2014-10-07, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1410070126 Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Issues removing RRECOMMENDS packages with BAD_RECOMMENDATIONS X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 14:04:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/10/2014 11:26, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 7 October 2014 11:20, Carr, Chris (GE Intelligent Platforms) > wrote: >> I've switched over to the RPM package manager and rebuilt the deploy image. >> >> From the list that I had in BAD_RECOMMENDATIONS, none of the packages appear in the deploy image. > > So we're found a difference in behaviour between the rpm and opkg > backends. Can you file a bug for the opkg backend in bugzilla? > (oe-core->deployment). > > Ross > I've raised the bug in bugzilla. https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6816 Chris