From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: elfring@users.sourceforge.net (SF Markus Elfring)
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 14:20:49 +0200
Subject: [Cocci] Searching for pass-through functions
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1410081407400.2441@hadrien>
References: <54303340.3090901@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410042116320.2079@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <54305719.1050304@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410042331240.2079@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <54312F70.3080809@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410051347570.2229@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <54313662.8000402@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410051729480.2022@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <543522B0.9020700@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1410081351060.2441@hadrien>
 <5435279E.2070901@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1410081407400.2441@hadrien>
Message-ID: <54352C21.3050309@users.sourceforge.net>
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
List-Id: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr

> I see no reason why a regular expression would be more usefu than a simple
> list of names.

Would you like to suggest an approach for a search pattern that will work better
to exclude (!) some functions with a SmPL disjunction instead of a construction
with a long regular expression in a constraint?


> That is, I would expect that the names have nothing to do with each other.

Their relationship was determined by the shown analysis.

Regards,
Markus