From: elfring@users.sourceforge.net (SF Markus Elfring)
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Subject: [Cocci] Searching for pass-through functions
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 20:05:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54357CFA.8070808@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1410081446320.2441@hadrien>
> @@
> identifier other_functions;
> @@
>
> (
> \(function\|names\|that\|are\|of\|no\|interest\)
> |
> * other_functions
> )
> (...)
Thanks for another example of a semantic patch rule.
Would any more fine-tuning make sense for the shown SmPL disjunction when it
gets longer?
Does the current Coccinelle software support to organise entries in such a name
list into subgroups where common prefixes or suffixes will be used?
Your suggestion comes close to my idea to work with the functionality "negative
lookaround" (in constraints) for some use cases.
http://www.regular-expressions.info/lookaround.html
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-08 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-04 17:49 [Cocci] Searching for pass-through functions SF Markus Elfring
2014-10-04 19:17 ` Julia Lawall
2014-10-04 20:22 ` SF Markus Elfring
2014-10-04 21:32 ` Julia Lawall
2014-10-05 6:48 ` SF Markus Elfring
2014-10-05 9:39 ` Julia Lawall
2014-10-05 13:15 ` SF Markus Elfring
2014-10-05 11:45 ` SF Markus Elfring
2014-10-05 11:48 ` Julia Lawall
2014-10-05 12:15 ` SF Markus Elfring
2014-10-05 15:33 ` Julia Lawall
2014-10-05 16:38 ` SF Markus Elfring
2014-10-05 16:42 ` Julia Lawall
2014-10-05 16:55 ` SF Markus Elfring
2014-10-05 17:01 ` Julia Lawall
2014-10-05 17:09 ` SF Markus Elfring
2014-10-05 18:37 ` SF Markus Elfring
2014-10-08 11:40 ` SF Markus Elfring
2014-10-08 11:51 ` Julia Lawall
2014-10-08 12:01 ` SF Markus Elfring
2014-10-08 12:08 ` Julia Lawall
2014-10-08 12:20 ` SF Markus Elfring
2014-10-08 12:48 ` Julia Lawall
2014-10-08 13:01 ` SF Markus Elfring
2014-10-08 18:05 ` SF Markus Elfring [this message]
2014-10-09 5:37 ` Julia Lawall
2014-10-07 19:39 ` SF Markus Elfring
2014-10-07 19:44 ` Julia Lawall
2014-10-07 20:20 ` SF Markus Elfring
2014-10-07 20:26 ` Julia Lawall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54357CFA.8070808@users.sourceforge.net \
--to=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.