From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: walter harms Subject: Re: abs.3 Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 19:51:09 +0200 Message-ID: <5436CB0D.6040709@bfs.de> References: Reply-To: wharms-fPG8STNUNVg@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-man-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jonny Grant Cc: Michael Kerrisk , linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Am 09.10.2014 13:24, schrieb Jonny Grant: > http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/abs.3.html > > Hello > This page shows: > > "GCC handles abs() and labs() as built-in functions. GCC 3.0 also > handles llabs() and imaxabs() as built-ins." > > As GCC3 has been around for 10 years now.. should these be combined? e.g. > > " GCC handles abs(), labs(), llabs() and imaxabs() as built-in functions." > > There may be other man pages with similar GCC 3.0 references that > could be combined now. > I would add "By default gcc ..." since you have a switch not to use built-in's at all. re, wh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html