From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: julien.grall@citrix.com, Ian.Campbell@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] xen/arm: introduce GNTTABOP_cache_flush
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 13:04:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5437CB5A.3090608@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1412941440-5646-5-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Hi Stefano,
On 10/10/2014 12:43, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> +static int __gnttab_cache_flush(gnttab_cache_flush_t *cflush)
> +{
> + struct domain *d, *owner;
> + struct page_info *page;
> + uint64_t mfn;
> + void *v;
> +
> + if ( (cflush->offset >= PAGE_SIZE) ||
> + (cflush->length > PAGE_SIZE) ||
> + (cflush->offset + cflush->length > PAGE_SIZE) )
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if ( cflush->length == 0 || cflush->op == 0 )
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* currently unimplemented */
> + if ( cflush->op & GNTTAB_CACHE_SOURCE_GREF )
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
I may have miss a part of the discussion. What is the purpose of
introducing a flag that is not supported? Do we expect to implement on
Xen 4.6?
--
Julien Grall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-10 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-10 11:42 [PATCH v4 0/7] xen/arm: introduce GNTTABOP_cache_flush Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-10 11:43 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] xen: introduce gnttab_max_nr_maptrack_frames command line option Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-10 13:08 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-13 9:59 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-13 10:38 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-13 10:45 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-10 11:43 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] xen/arm: rename *_xen_dcache_* operations to *_dcache_* Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-10 11:43 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] xen/arm: introduce invalidate_dcache_va_range Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-10 11:43 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] xen/x86: introduce more cache maintenance operations Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-10 13:16 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-13 10:35 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-13 10:47 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-13 11:09 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-10 11:43 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] xen/arm: introduce GNTTABOP_cache_flush Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-10 12:04 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2014-10-10 13:25 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-10 11:43 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] Revert "xen/arm: introduce XENFEAT_grant_map_identity" Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-10 11:53 ` Julien Grall
2014-10-10 11:44 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] Revert "xen: introduce arch_grant_(un)map_page_identity" Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-10 11:54 ` Julien Grall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5437CB5A.3090608@linaro.org \
--to=julien.grall@linaro.org \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=julien.grall@citrix.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.