From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: arm7 gitbuilder ? Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 21:16:12 +0200 Message-ID: <5438307C.4060701@dachary.org> References: <5437A6C0.3000005@dachary.org> <5438134E.7050009@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QBpJBKVNwp7pD9e2DrpLllV055OO48gLQ" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:42191 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751993AbaJJTQT (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:16:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Noah Watkins Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --QBpJBKVNwp7pD9e2DrpLllV055OO48gLQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Noah, My focus is to create centos7 and ubuntu-14.04 packages at this point. An= d somehow find a way to convince teuthology to use them instead of what h= ttp://ceph.com/gitbuilder.cgi creates, but that's a separate issue. What kind of output would you like to get from these arm7 machines ? Cheers On 10/10/2014 19:55, Noah Watkins wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Sage Weil wrote: >> On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, Loic Dachary wrote: >>> On 10/10/2014 17:11, Sage Weil wrote: >>>> On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>>> Hi Sandon, >>>>> >>>>> Would it be possible to resurect / create an arm7 gitbuilder for >>>>> whatever distribution is more convenient ? Janne made a great >>>>> contribution to erasure code optimization on NEON ( >>>>> https://bitbucket.org/jannau/gf-complete/branch/neon ) and it would= make >>>>> it easier to have a gitbuilder to run it throught teuthology and to= rture >>>>> it ;-) If that's complicated or there is another way to run teuthol= ogy >>>>> jobs for this purpose, I'm open to suggestions. >>>> >>>> We have a bunch of armv7l nodes that used to run distcc and a gitbui= lder. >>>> It's a bit of a time suck to maintain, though. Is there an interest= ed >>>> party we can set up with lab access that can help administer these o= n an >>>> ongoing basis? Sandon is a highly contended resource. :) >>> >>> Long term I'm not sure. I'll try to setup something temporary and see= >>> where it goes. Is there a risk that these machines go away in the nex= t 6 >>> months ? 3 months ? >=20 > I am an interested party, and at least in the short term would > dedicate some time to getting arm7 builds working too. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --QBpJBKVNwp7pD9e2DrpLllV055OO48gLQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlQ4MHwACgkQ8dLMyEl6F20Y4gCfX9C/ZMIyhsrfasmbwmKZ5rpc ErMAnRyCjRQFMoaHLUr4cfyHfZqw22+g =nOov -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QBpJBKVNwp7pD9e2DrpLllV055OO48gLQ--