From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: ISA plugin tests Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 22:07:58 +0200 Message-ID: <54383C9E.6050801@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sguo4uI0E6F1bppc0Bt8Vr7mW8bGCTqqa" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:42220 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751797AbaJJUIJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2014 16:08:09 -0400 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Andreas-Joachim Peters Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --sguo4uI0E6F1bppc0Bt8Vr7mW8bGCTqqa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Andreas, Not every mail is about problems ;-) I'm happy to report that the ISA plu= gin you wrote passes the rados suite http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2014-10-10_08:45:20-rados:thrash-erasure-cod= e-isa-master-testing-basic-vps/ The rhel failures should be ignored, they are unrelated. And the only ubu= ntu failure is about http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9443 I'll have a glass of wine to celebrate ! Cheers --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --sguo4uI0E6F1bppc0Bt8Vr7mW8bGCTqqa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEUEARECAAYFAlQ4PJ4ACgkQ8dLMyEl6F23xvgCYz4YjlU5bNAvv8HTeYG0dmFrj rQCfXxqUbfxBXpWMBLHK/YvDcJ73aAU= =T/wz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sguo4uI0E6F1bppc0Bt8Vr7mW8bGCTqqa--