From: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@inwind.it>
To: Bob Marley <bobmarley@shiftmail.org>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: What is the vision for btrfs fs repair?
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 09:29:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5438DC47.7000901@inwind.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5437BAB2.1040605@shiftmail.org>
On 10/10/2014 12:53 PM, Bob Marley wrote:
>>
>> If true, maybe the closest indication we'd get of btrfs stablity is
>> the default enabling of autorecovery.
>
> No way! I wouldn't want a default like that.
>
> If you think at distributed transactions: suppose a sync was issued
> on both sides of a distributed transaction, then power was lost on
> one side, than btrfs had corruption. When I remount it, definitely
> the worst thing that can happen is that it auto-rolls-back to a
> previous known-good state.
I cannot agree. I consider a sane default to have a consistent state with
"the recently data written lost", instead of "require the user
intervention to not lost anything".
To address your requirement, we need a "super sync" command which
ensure that the data are in the filesystem and not only
in the log (as sync should ensure).
BR
--
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-11 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-08 19:11 What is the vision for btrfs fs repair? Eric Sandeen
2014-10-09 11:29 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2014-10-09 11:53 ` Duncan
2014-10-09 11:55 ` Hugo Mills
2014-10-09 12:07 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2014-10-09 12:12 ` Hugo Mills
2014-10-09 12:32 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
[not found] ` <107Y1p00G0wm9Bl0107vjZ>
2014-10-09 12:34 ` Duncan
2014-10-09 13:18 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2014-10-09 13:49 ` Duncan
2014-10-09 15:44 ` Eric Sandeen
[not found] ` <0zvr1p0162Q6ekd01zvtN0>
2014-10-09 12:42 ` Duncan
2014-10-10 1:58 ` Chris Murphy
2014-10-10 3:20 ` Duncan
2014-10-10 10:53 ` Bob Marley
2014-10-10 10:59 ` Roman Mamedov
2014-10-10 11:12 ` Bob Marley
2014-10-10 15:18 ` cwillu
2014-10-10 14:37 ` Chris Murphy
2014-10-10 17:43 ` Bob Marley
2014-10-10 17:53 ` Bardur Arantsson
2014-10-10 19:35 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2014-10-10 22:05 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-10-13 11:26 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2014-10-12 10:14 ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-10-12 23:59 ` Duncan
2014-10-13 11:37 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2014-10-13 11:48 ` Rich Freeman
2014-10-11 7:29 ` Goffredo Baroncelli [this message]
2014-11-17 20:55 ` Phillip Susi
2014-10-12 10:06 ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-10-12 10:17 ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-10-13 21:09 ` Josef Bacik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5438DC47.7000901@inwind.it \
--to=kreijack@inwind.it \
--cc=bobmarley@shiftmail.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.