All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
	Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Sechang Lim <rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com>,
	Varun R Mallya <varunrmallya@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Fix sleepable check for tracing prog
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 23:54:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <543929db-24c4-408c-99ae-99b4eca002e6@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f13939eb-d8b9-401b-aac6-6004d395a049@redhat.com>

On 2026/7/24 23:41, Viktor Malik wrote:
> On 7/24/26 16:14, Leon Hwang wrote:
>> When CONFIG_FUNCTION_ERROR_INJECTION is disabled, a sleepable tracing prog
>> is allowed to attach to '__x64_'-alike prefix symbols.
>>
>> It is because the verifier does not verify whether the symbol is a kernel
>> function or a bpf prog. That said, a sleepable tracing prog is allowed to
>> attach to a bpf prog target whose name has '__x64_'-alike prefix.
>>
>> For example, a sleepable fentry prog attaches to a '__x64_sys_nop' XDP
>> prog, and copies buffer from a user pointer with bpf_copy_from_user()
>> helper. After attaching the XDP prog to lo interface, the kernel BUG
>> could be triggered by 'ping -c 1 -W 1 127.0.0.1':
>>
>> [    3.460756] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/bpf/trampoline.c:1324
>>
>> Fix it by disallowing sleepable tracing prog always when its target is
>> bpf prog.
>>
>> Fixes: 16d9c5660692 ("bpf: Always allow sleepable programs on syscalls")
>> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
>> ---
>>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 9 ++++++---
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>> index 52be0a118cce..40d567b90d24 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>> @@ -18935,13 +18935,16 @@ static bool is_tracing_multi_id(const struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 btf_id)
>>  }
>>  
>>  static int btf_id_allow_sleepable(u32 btf_id, unsigned long addr, const struct bpf_prog *prog,
>> -				  const struct btf *btf)
>> +				  const struct btf *btf, const struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog)
>>  {
>>  	const struct btf_type *t;
>>  	const char *tname;
>>  
>>  	switch (prog->type) {
>>  	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING:
>> +		if (tgt_prog)
>> +			return prog->sleepable ? -EINVAL : 0;
> 
> The prog->sleepable check is redundant since btf_id_allow_sleepable() is
> only called if prog->sleepable is true.


Good catch.

Will drop the prog->sleepable check.

> 
> Other than that:
> 
> Acked-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>

Thanks for your review.

Leon

> [...]


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-24 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-24 14:14 [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] bpf: Fix sleepable check for tracing prog Leon Hwang
2026-07-24 14:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] " Leon Hwang
2026-07-24 15:41   ` Viktor Malik
2026-07-24 15:54     ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2026-07-24 14:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Verify rejection of sleepable " Leon Hwang
2026-07-24 14:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 15:13     ` Leon Hwang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=543929db-24c4-408c-99ae-99b4eca002e6@linux.dev \
    --to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=varunrmallya@gmail.com \
    --cc=vmalik@redhat.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.