From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail16.tpgi.com.au (mail16.tpgi.com.au [203.12.160.231]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC3D65D56 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 03:00:12 +0000 (UTC) X-TPG-Junk-Status: Message not scanned X-TPG-Antivirus: Passed X-TPG-Abuse: host=60-242-171-118.static.tpgi.com.au; ip=60.242.171.118; date=Mon, 13 Oct 2014 14:00:11 +1100 Received: from gw.urbanec.net (60-242-171-118.static.tpgi.com.au [60.242.171.118]) by mail16.tpgi.com.au (envelope-from openembedded-devel@urbanec.net) (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id s9D308Ef032462 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 14:00:11 +1100 Received: from beep.urbanec.net ([192.168.42.2]) by gw.urbanec.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XdVri-0000iN-PL for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 14:00:06 +1100 Message-ID: <543B4036.7040606@urbanec.net> Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 14:00:06 +1100 From: Peter Urbanec User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <54380BF4.6010205@urbanec.net> <54381C20.2060602@linux.intel.com> <1413011133.7562.5.camel@ted> In-Reply-To: <1413011133.7562.5.camel@ted> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for gcc bug 61144 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 03:00:19 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/10/14 18:05, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 10:49 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: >> Thank you for the patches. >> >> Please review the >> http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines > > Just to be clear, because of the important nature of the gcc fix and our > looming release deadlines, Saul has sent out a version of it in this > case. We don't normally do that. Gentlemen, Thanks for cleaning up the gcc patch and getting it in. Much appreciated! As far as the pre/postrm patch is concerned, I'll resubmit a little later. Now that I have some feedback on the patch, I can see scope for improvement. When I do re-submit, I'll heed the guidelines. Thanks for your guidance. Peter