From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <543ECACE.7080108@thax.hardliners.org> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 21:28:14 +0200 From: Tobias Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <34701921-5F04-411C-B35C-78CED619AAC3@apple.com> <5432910A.4030500@gmail.com> <54344707.4080604@gmail.com> <54345EF9.5010405@thax.hardliners.org> <54350A8E.1010406@gmail.com> <54354CDA.50401@thax.hardliners.org> <5435A44F.7080504@thax.hardliners.org> <54383C34.6020108@thax.hardliners.org> <5438486E.9050201@gmail.com> <543D9108.6050307@thax.hardliners.org> <543E5168.9010108@thax.hardliners.org> <543E72C7.3090603@gmail.com> <543E9E08.7080307@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <543E9E08.7080307@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Printing-architecture] Number of copies in pure PDF workflow List-Id: Printing architecture under linux List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Till Kamppeter Cc: "printing-architecture@lists.linux-foundation.org" On 15/10/14 18:17, Till Kamppeter wrote: > And anyone reading this, please tell whether the patch is OK or can > cause problems in certain situations. One more thing I forgot: In case imagetopdf is called as the last filter, and pdftopdf is not used, it will have to be patched, too. (imagetops containes explicit code for hardware copies in PS, because it could be the last filter -- not sure if that's still the case for PDF). And a minor correction to my earlier mail: > 2) will only insert @PCL SET COPIES, when jcl_begin uses the known PJL > begin sequence (copied from what pstops does wrt. to PCL). To be more precise: Copied from cups/emit.c (which is what pstops uses). Tobias