From: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com>
Cc: Addy Ke <addy.ke@rock-chips.com>,
Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org>,
chris@printf.net, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: Remove old card detect infrastructure
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 18:38:10 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <543F9202.8010806@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <543F7F91.1010609@samsung.com>
Hi, Doug.
Add one comment.
On 10/16/2014 05:19 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Hi, Doug.
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Tested-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
> with exynos3/4 series.
>
> Need to check exynos5 with using other "card detect" mechanism.
>
> Best Regards,
> Jaehoon Chung
>
> On 10/15/2014 01:33 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> The dw_mmc driver had a bunch of code that ran whenever a card was
>> ejected and inserted. However, this code was old and crufty and
>> should be removed. Some evidence that it's really not needed:
>>
>> 1. Is is supposed to be legal to use 'cd-gpio' on dw_mmc instead of
>> using the built-in card detect mechanism. The 'cd-gpio' code
>> doesn't run any of the crufty old code but yet still works.
>>
>> 2. While looking at this, I realized that my old change (369ac86 mmc:
>> dw_mmc: don't queue up a card detect at slot startup) actually
>> castrated the old code a little bit already and nobody noticed.
>> Specifically "last_detect_state" was left as 0 at bootup. That
>> means that on the first card removal none of the crufty code ran.
>>
>> 3. I can run "while true; do dd if=/dev/mmcblk1 of=/dev/null; done"
>> while ejecting and inserting an SD Card and the world doesn't
>> explode.
>>
>> If some of the crufty old code is actually needed, we should justify
>> it and also put it in some place where it will be run even with
>> "cd-gpio".
>>
>> Note that in my case I'm using the "cd-gpio" mechanism but for various
>> reasons the hardware triggers a dw_mmc "card detect" at bootup. That
>> was actually causing a real bug. The card detect workqueue was
>> running while the system was trying to enumerate the card. The
>> "present != slot->last_detect_state" triggered and we were doing all
>> kinds of crazy stuff and messing up enumeration. The new mechanism of
>> just asking the core to check the card is much safer and then the
>> bogus interrupt doesn't hurt.
Did you read the Card-detect Recommendation?
There is a Recommendation for Card-detect(CDT) at TRM.
We don't read the CDETECT register(0x50) anywhere. Could you share this register value after detecting?
And I think "last_detect_state" is used for "software should read card detect register and store in memory."
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 121 ++++++++-------------------------------------
>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h | 2 -
>> include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h | 2 -
>> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> index 69f0cc6..6a86495 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> @@ -34,7 +34,6 @@
>> #include <linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h>
>> #include <linux/bitops.h>
>> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>> -#include <linux/workqueue.h>
>> #include <linux/of.h>
>> #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
>> #include <linux/mmc/slot-gpio.h>
>> @@ -1954,6 +1953,23 @@ static void dw_mci_cmd_interrupt(struct dw_mci *host, u32 status)
>> tasklet_schedule(&host->tasklet);
>> }
>>
>> +static void dw_mci_handle_cd(struct dw_mci *host)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < host->num_slots; i++) {
>> + struct dw_mci_slot *slot = host->slot[i];
>> +
>> + if (!slot)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + if (slot->mmc->ops->card_event)
>> + slot->mmc->ops->card_event(slot->mmc);
>> + mmc_detect_change(slot->mmc,
>> + msecs_to_jiffies(host->pdata->detect_delay_ms));
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> static irqreturn_t dw_mci_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> {
>> struct dw_mci *host = dev_id;
>> @@ -2029,7 +2045,7 @@ static irqreturn_t dw_mci_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>>
>> if (pending & SDMMC_INT_CD) {
>> mci_writel(host, RINTSTS, SDMMC_INT_CD);
>> - queue_work(host->card_workqueue, &host->card_work);
>> + dw_mci_handle_cd(host);
>> }
>>
>> /* Handle SDIO Interrupts */
>> @@ -2056,88 +2072,6 @@ static irqreturn_t dw_mci_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> }
>>
>> -static void dw_mci_work_routine_card(struct work_struct *work)
>> -{
>> - struct dw_mci *host = container_of(work, struct dw_mci, card_work);
>> - int i;
>> -
>> - for (i = 0; i < host->num_slots; i++) {
>> - struct dw_mci_slot *slot = host->slot[i];
>> - struct mmc_host *mmc = slot->mmc;
>> - struct mmc_request *mrq;
>> - int present;
>> -
>> - present = dw_mci_get_cd(mmc);
>> - while (present != slot->last_detect_state) {
>> - dev_dbg(&slot->mmc->class_dev, "card %s\n",
>> - present ? "inserted" : "removed");
>> -
>> - spin_lock_bh(&host->lock);
>> -
>> - /* Card change detected */
>> - slot->last_detect_state = present;
>> -
>> - /* Clean up queue if present */
>> - mrq = slot->mrq;
>> - if (mrq) {
>> - if (mrq == host->mrq) {
>> - host->data = NULL;
>> - host->cmd = NULL;
>> -
>> - switch (host->state) {
>> - case STATE_IDLE:
>> - case STATE_WAITING_CMD11_DONE:
>> - break;
>> - case STATE_SENDING_CMD11:
>> - case STATE_SENDING_CMD:
>> - mrq->cmd->error = -ENOMEDIUM;
>> - if (!mrq->data)
>> - break;
>> - /* fall through */
>> - case STATE_SENDING_DATA:
>> - mrq->data->error = -ENOMEDIUM;
>> - dw_mci_stop_dma(host);
>> - break;
>> - case STATE_DATA_BUSY:
>> - case STATE_DATA_ERROR:
>> - if (mrq->data->error == -EINPROGRESS)
>> - mrq->data->error = -ENOMEDIUM;
>> - /* fall through */
>> - case STATE_SENDING_STOP:
>> - if (mrq->stop)
>> - mrq->stop->error = -ENOMEDIUM;
>> - break;
>> - }
>> -
>> - dw_mci_request_end(host, mrq);
>> - } else {
>> - list_del(&slot->queue_node);
>> - mrq->cmd->error = -ENOMEDIUM;
>> - if (mrq->data)
>> - mrq->data->error = -ENOMEDIUM;
>> - if (mrq->stop)
>> - mrq->stop->error = -ENOMEDIUM;
>> -
>> - spin_unlock(&host->lock);
>> - mmc_request_done(slot->mmc, mrq);
>> - spin_lock(&host->lock);
>> - }
>> - }
>> -
>> - /* Power down slot */
>> - if (present == 0)
>> - dw_mci_reset(host);
>> -
>> - spin_unlock_bh(&host->lock);
>> -
>> - present = dw_mci_get_cd(mmc);
>> - }
>> -
>> - mmc_detect_change(slot->mmc,
>> - msecs_to_jiffies(host->pdata->detect_delay_ms));
>> - }
>> -}
>> -
>> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
>> /* given a slot id, find out the device node representing that slot */
>> static struct device_node *dw_mci_of_find_slot_node(struct device *dev, u8 slot)
>> @@ -2289,9 +2223,6 @@ static int dw_mci_init_slot(struct dw_mci *host, unsigned int id)
>> dw_mci_init_debugfs(slot);
>> #endif
>>
>> - /* Card initially undetected */
>> - slot->last_detect_state = 0;
>> -
>> return 0;
>>
>> err_host_allocated:
>> @@ -2672,17 +2603,10 @@ int dw_mci_probe(struct dw_mci *host)
>> host->data_offset = DATA_240A_OFFSET;
>>
>> tasklet_init(&host->tasklet, dw_mci_tasklet_func, (unsigned long)host);
>> - host->card_workqueue = alloc_workqueue("dw-mci-card",
>> - WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 1);
>> - if (!host->card_workqueue) {
>> - ret = -ENOMEM;
>> - goto err_dmaunmap;
>> - }
>> - INIT_WORK(&host->card_work, dw_mci_work_routine_card);
>> ret = devm_request_irq(host->dev, host->irq, dw_mci_interrupt,
>> host->irq_flags, "dw-mci", host);
>> if (ret)
>> - goto err_workqueue;
>> + goto err_dmaunmap;
>>
>> if (host->pdata->num_slots)
>> host->num_slots = host->pdata->num_slots;
>> @@ -2718,7 +2642,7 @@ int dw_mci_probe(struct dw_mci *host)
>> } else {
>> dev_dbg(host->dev, "attempted to initialize %d slots, "
>> "but failed on all\n", host->num_slots);
>> - goto err_workqueue;
>> + goto err_dmaunmap;
>> }
>>
>> if (host->quirks & DW_MCI_QUIRK_IDMAC_DTO)
>> @@ -2726,9 +2650,6 @@ int dw_mci_probe(struct dw_mci *host)
>>
>> return 0;
>>
>> -err_workqueue:
>> - destroy_workqueue(host->card_workqueue);
>> -
>> err_dmaunmap:
>> if (host->use_dma && host->dma_ops->exit)
>> host->dma_ops->exit(host);
>> @@ -2762,8 +2683,6 @@ void dw_mci_remove(struct dw_mci *host)
>> mci_writel(host, CLKENA, 0);
>> mci_writel(host, CLKSRC, 0);
>>
>> - destroy_workqueue(host->card_workqueue);
>> -
>> if (host->use_dma && host->dma_ops->exit)
>> host->dma_ops->exit(host);
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
>> index 01b99e8..71d4995 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
>> @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ extern int dw_mci_resume(struct dw_mci *host);
>> * with CONFIG_MMC_CLKGATE.
>> * @flags: Random state bits associated with the slot.
>> * @id: Number of this slot.
>> - * @last_detect_state: Most recently observed card detect state.
>> */
>> struct dw_mci_slot {
>> struct mmc_host *mmc;
>> @@ -234,7 +233,6 @@ struct dw_mci_slot {
>> #define DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT 0
>> #define DW_MMC_CARD_NEED_INIT 1
>> int id;
>> - int last_detect_state;
>> };
>>
>> struct dw_mci_tuning_data {
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h b/include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h
>> index 0013669..69d0814 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h
>> @@ -135,7 +135,6 @@ struct dw_mci {
>> struct mmc_command stop_abort;
>> unsigned int prev_blksz;
>> unsigned char timing;
>> - struct workqueue_struct *card_workqueue;
>>
>> /* DMA interface members*/
>> int use_dma;
>> @@ -154,7 +153,6 @@ struct dw_mci {
>> u32 stop_cmdr;
>> u32 dir_status;
>> struct tasklet_struct tasklet;
>> - struct work_struct card_work;
>> unsigned long pending_events;
>> unsigned long completed_events;
>> enum dw_mci_state state;
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-16 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-14 16:33 [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: Remove old card detect infrastructure Doug Anderson
2014-10-16 8:19 ` Jaehoon Chung
2014-10-16 9:38 ` Jaehoon Chung [this message]
2014-10-16 16:05 ` Doug Anderson
2014-10-16 12:57 ` Alim Akhtar
2014-10-16 16:10 ` Doug Anderson
2014-10-17 12:44 ` Alim Akhtar
2014-10-20 3:23 ` Jaehoon Chung
2014-10-22 16:36 ` Doug Anderson
2014-10-23 1:13 ` Jaehoon Chung
2014-10-23 12:43 ` Alim Akhtar
2014-10-27 15:42 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=543F9202.8010806@samsung.com \
--to=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=abrestic@chromium.org \
--cc=addy.ke@rock-chips.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=chris@printf.net \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sonnyrao@chromium.org \
--cc=tgih.jun@samsung.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.