All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
To: "Matt W. Benjamin" <matt@cohortfs.com>,
	ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Casey Bodley <casey@cohortfs.com>
Subject: Re: ceph performance call:  buffer
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:16:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54400B8F.8090204@dachary.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1071486299.106.1413482432334.JavaMail.root@thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1299 bytes --]

Hi Matt,

You will probably be interested in


On 16/10/2014 11:00, Matt W. Benjamin wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> 
> Per yesterday's Ceph performance call, we've pushed 2 wip branches for review and feedback to https://github.com/linuxbox2/linuxbox-ceph.git .
> 
> 1. xio-v084-inline reorganizes ceph::buffer as a namespace, and (nearly) all of
> buffer::hash, buffer::ptr and buffer::list as inline
> 
> 2. xio-v084-inline-flat restores some raw encapsulation lost in the prior change,
> then refactors buffer::raw to remove virtual methods
> 
> We've made some effort to measure the impact of the changes, but don't have
> reliable data yet.  (It's possible that our initial impression of improvement from the inlining change was not accurate, but more likely we need better workload tests.)
> 
> In addition, we've been working on an experiment to refactor buffer::ptr and buffer::raw to use boost::intrusive::list, to unify the interfaces of the two types to permit interning buffer::raw directly on the containing list when there is no sharing, and a slab allocator for both types.  We plan to push a wip branch with these changes to when they've stabilized a bit more and/or we have real perf numbers.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Matt
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 263 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-16 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-16 18:00 ceph performance call: buffer Matt W. Benjamin
2014-10-16 18:16 ` Loic Dachary [this message]
2014-10-16 18:21   ` Loic Dachary
2014-10-16 18:42     ` Matt W. Benjamin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54400B8F.8090204@dachary.org \
    --to=loic@dachary.org \
    --cc=casey@cohortfs.com \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt@cohortfs.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.