From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7938545600342964205=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Joe Konno <joe.konno at linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Powertop] [PATCH v2 8/8] Adding a clean_shutdown function
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:34:51 -0700
Message-ID: <5441533B.1090405@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: 20141015125922.GD1189@swordfish
To: powertop@lists.01.org
List-ID: <powertop@lists.01.org>

--===============7938545600342964205==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 10/15/2014 05:59 AM, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> =

> I would agree on that refactoring if we would call this function
> from several places. otherwise, I see no actual reason.
> =

> 	-ss

I'm sympathetic to that argument. I haven't a strong feeling one way or
the other in this instance, though.

Alex and maintainers?

--===============7938545600342964205==--