From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kirill V Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2] sched/deadline: do not try to push tasks if pinned task switches to dl
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:11:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5446316B.4070707@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1412989095-7507-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Hi,
On 11/10/14 01:58, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> As Kirill mentioned(https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/29/118):
> | If rq has already had 2 or more pushable tasks and we try to add a
> | pinned task then call of push_rt_task will just waste a time.
>
> Just switched pinned task is not able to be pushed. If the rq had had
^
has
> several dl tasks before they have already been considered as candidates
> to be pushed (or pulled). This patch done the same behavior as rt class
^
implements? aligns to...
> which introduced by commit 10447917551e ("sched/rt: Do not try to push
> tasks if pinned task switches to RT").
>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> * use 12 or more chars for the git commit ID
>
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index abfaf3d..cf7c9b6 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -1603,7 +1603,8 @@ static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>
> if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && rq->curr != p) {
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> - if (rq->dl.overloaded && push_dl_task(rq) && rq != task_rq(p))
> + if (p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1 && rq->dl.overloaded
> + && push_dl_task(rq) && rq != task_rq(p))
I'd personally align this && to p->nr_cpus_allowed, but that's just my
personal taste, though. :)
> /* Only reschedule if pushing failed */
> check_resched = 0;
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
Anyway, the change looks good, thanks!
Best,
- Juri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-21 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-11 0:58 [PATCH RESEND v2] sched/deadline: do not try to push tasks if pinned task switches to dl Wanpeng Li
2014-10-21 10:11 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2014-10-21 12:14 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5446316B.4070707@arm.com \
--to=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tkhai@yandex.ru \
--cc=wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.