From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47961) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgWl9-0000v8-IC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 06:33:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgWl3-0000vn-DD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 06:33:47 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.64]:39493) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgWl2-0000vZ-Og for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 06:33:41 -0400 Message-ID: <54463652.4020200@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 18:32:50 +0800 From: Gonglei MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1413375585-20301-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <1413375585-20301-7-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <20141015123110.GA3741@redhat.com> <1413382769.4213.5.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> <20141015143915.GE3741@redhat.com> <1413456389.18160.1.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> <5440B85F.3060307@huawei.com> <1413788563.3509.7.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> <5445F7D1.5060903@huawei.com> <1413881843.14632.6.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> <544622E9.4020105@huawei.com> <1413884106.14632.8.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> In-Reply-To: <1413884106.14632.8.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] vnc: track & limit connections List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: "Huangweidong (C)" , "Huangpeng (Peter)" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Anthony Liguori , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" On 2014/10/21 17:35, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > >> Yes. But I think it is not a big problem, when the REJECT_TIME is over, >> the good guys can connect vnc successfully immediately. >> Or maybe we just lock those guys with "the same Source IP address" ? > > Better. Question is whenever we really want implement those schemes > within qemu or leave that to the firewall to handle (connlimit comes to > mind, see "man iptables-extensions"). > Got it. > Doing it in qemu IMO only makes sense when using information the > firewall doesn't have. With sasl enabled we can slow down login > attempts *per user* for example. > OK. Thanks for your opinion. :) Best regards, -Gonglei