From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from aratiri.netvision.com.py ([200.1.203.34]:57005 "EHLO aratiri.netvision.com.py" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933046AbaJURgK (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:36:10 -0400 Message-ID: <54468BA0.20405@netvision.com.py> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:36:48 -0300 From: "Julio E. Gonzalez P." MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cristian Falcas CC: linux-btrfs Subject: Re: downgrade from kernel 3.17 to 3.10 References: <544679BE.9080901@pobox.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: When you say "el6" you mean "el7" right? The last kernel for el7 is 3.10.xxxxx But Redhat lie a little with kernel version numbers. They say you have a 3.10 kernel, but I think they backport a lot from newers kernels. Probably the btrfs of redhat el7 is not really a btrfs from 3.10, maybe is btrfs from 3.12 or 3.14....how knows... (I want to know better about this too...also using btfrs in rhel7) On 10/21/2014 12:34 PM, Cristian Falcas wrote: > I will start investigating how can we build our own rpms from the 3.16 > sources. Until then we are stuck with the ones from the official repos > or elrepo. Which means 3.10 is the latest for el6. We used this until > now and seems we where lucky enough to not hit anything bad. > > We upgraded to 3.17 because we use ceph on the machine with openstack > and on the ceph site they recommended >3.14. And because we need > writable snapshots, we are forced to use btrfs under ceph. > > Thank you all for your advice. > >