From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:12:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from arrakis.dune.hu ([78.24.191.176]:58457 "EHLO arrakis.dune.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S27011261AbaJVHMJkcWeG (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:12:09 +0200 Received: from arrakis.dune.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arrakis.dune.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1750E281473; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:10:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dicker-alter.lan (p548C87DD.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.140.135.221]) by arrakis.dune.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:10:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <544758AB.3060100@openwrt.org> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:11:39 +0200 From: John Crispin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: eunb.song@samsung.com, "ralf@linux-mips.org" CC: "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips: add arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() function References: <1061520101.169091413960858532.JavaMail.weblogic@epmlwas02b> In-Reply-To: <1061520101.169091413960858532.JavaMail.weblogic@epmlwas02b> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=EUC-KR Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 43469 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: blogic@openwrt.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On 22/10/2014 08:54, Eunbong Song wrote: > >> Hi Eubong, > >> one small question inline ... > >>> +void arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(bool); +#define >>> arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace > >> What is the purpose of this define ? is this maybe a leftover from >> some regex/cleanups ? > > Hi John. > Actually, I just follow the same function of sparc architecture. > You can find this in arch/sparc/include/asm/irq_64.h as below > > void arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(bool); > #define arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace > > I guess this is used for conditional compile. > See below. > include/linux/nmi.h > #ifdef arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace > static inline bool trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(void) > { > arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(true); > > return true; > } > static inline bool trigger_allbutself_cpu_backtrace(void) > { > arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(false); > return true; > } > #else > static inline bool trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(void) > { > return false; > } > static inline bool trigger_allbutself_cpu_backtrace(void) > { > return false; > } > #endif > > Thanks. >> John > i don't see how this is required for conditional compiles. the code define a->a which is bogus i think. John