All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
To: <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/1] gconf: fix multilib conflict - org.gnome.GConf.service
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:58:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54478DE1.9080202@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJTo0LZKKpiceby03E=fD6yqpxY4RTBXYKiCfqLgRj6CU4deiw@mail.gmail.com>

On 10/22/14, 6:07 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 22 October 2014 08:09, Chong Lu <Chong.Lu@windriver.com> wrote:
>> The gconfd-2 will be called in org.gnome.GConf.service file and the path of
>> gconfd-2 is ${libexecdir}, this will get following error when multilib exported
>> in the sdk:
>> error: file /usr/share/dbus-1/services/org.gnome.GConf.service from install
>> of gconf-3.2.6-r0.0.lib32_x86 conflicts with file from package
>> gconf-3.2.6-r0.0.x86_64
>
> I'm clearly not understanding how our multilib implementation works,
> but you don't need many copies of the main gconf package, just one in
> the preferred configuration. What is causing multiple copies of gconf
> to be installed?

Installing both the lib32 and "regular" version of gconf attempts to install the 
file "/usr/share/dbus-1/services/org.gnome.GConf.service" twice.  (This is 
normally acceptable, as long as the -contents- of the file are identical.)  For 
whatever reason the contents are different, and the usual way to fix this is to 
provide a unique file that both versions can include.

This way only one version will be installed, but yet the other service elements 
will be properly duplicated.

I'd like a bit more information in the commit message indicating what the 
conflict actually was between both files (since I believe the service file is 
textual so a diff is easy to include).

--Mark

> Ross
>



  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-22 10:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-22  7:09 [PATCH V3 0/1] gconf: fix multilib conflict - org.gnome.GConf.service Chong Lu
2014-10-22  7:09 ` [PATCH V3 1/1] " Chong Lu
2014-10-22 10:07   ` Burton, Ross
2014-10-22 10:58     ` Mark Hatle [this message]
2014-10-22 11:04       ` Burton, Ross
2014-10-24  2:26     ` Chong Lu
2014-10-26 20:58       ` Burton, Ross
2014-10-24  6:10   ` Koen Kooi
2014-10-24  6:16     ` Chong Lu
2014-10-24  7:01       ` Anders Darander

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54478DE1.9080202@windriver.com \
    --to=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.