All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@gmail.com>
To: Arnaud Kapp <kapp.arno@gmail.com>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: device balance times
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 07:22:33 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54479379.2000502@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5446C597.9080904@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2510 bytes --]

On 2014-10-21 16:44, Arnaud Kapp wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to ask if the balance time is related to the number of
> snapshot or if this is related only to data (or both).
>
> I currently have about 4TB of data and around 5k snapshots. I'm thinking
> of going raid1 instead of single. From the numbers I see this seems
> totally impossible as it would take *way* too long.
>
> Would destroying snapshots (those are hourly snapshots to prevent stupid
> error to happens, like `rm my_important_file`) help?
>
> Should I reconsider moving to raid1 because of the time it would take?
>
> Sorry if I'm somehow hijacking this thread, but it seemed related :)
>
> Thanks,
>
The issue is the snapshots, because I regularly fully re-balance my home 
directory on my desktop which is ~150GB on a BTRFS raid10 setup with 
only 3 or 4 snapshots (I only do daily snapshots, cause anything I need 
finer granularity on I have under git), and that takes only about 2 or 3 
hours depending on how many empty chunks I have.

I would remove the snapshots, and also start keeping fewer of them (5k 
hourly snapshots is more than six months worth of file versions), and 
then run the balance.  I would also suggest converting data by itself 
first, and then converting metadata, as converting data chunks will 
require re-writing large parts of the metadata.
> On 10/21/2014 10:14 PM, Piotr Pawłow wrote:
>> On 21.10.2014 20:59, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>>> FYI - after a failed disk and replacing it I've run a balance; it took
>>> almost 3 weeks to complete, for 120 GBs of data:
>>
>> Looks normal to me. Last time I started a balance after adding 6th
>> device to my FS, it took 4 days to move 25GBs of data. Some chunks took
>> 20 hours to move. I currently have 156 snapshots on this FS (nightly
>> rsync backups).
>>
>> I think it is so slow, because it's disassembling chunks piece by piece
>> and stuffing these pieces elsewhere, instead of moving chunks as a
>> whole. If you have a lot of little pieces (as I do), it will take a
>> while...
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 2455 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-10-22 11:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-21 18:59 device balance times Tomasz Chmielewski
2014-10-21 20:14 ` Piotr Pawłow
2014-10-21 20:44   ` Arnaud Kapp
2014-10-22  1:10     ` 5 _thousand_ snapshots? even 160? (was: device balance times) Robert White
2014-10-22  4:02       ` Zygo Blaxell
2014-10-22  4:05       ` Duncan
2014-10-23 20:38         ` 5 _thousand_ snapshots? even 160? Arnaud Kapp
2014-10-22 11:30       ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2014-10-22 17:32       ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-10-22 11:22     ` Austin S Hemmelgarn [this message]
2014-10-22  1:43   ` device balance times Chris Murphy
2014-10-22 12:40     ` Piotr Pawłow
2014-10-22 16:59       ` Bob Marley
2014-10-23  7:39         ` Russell Coker
2014-10-23  8:49           ` Duncan
2014-10-23  9:19       ` Miao Xie
2014-10-23 11:39         ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2014-10-24  1:05           ` Duncan
2014-10-24  2:35             ` Zygo Blaxell
2014-10-24  5:13               ` Duncan
2014-10-24 15:18                 ` Zygo Blaxell
2014-10-24 10:58               ` Rich Freeman
2014-10-24 16:07                 ` Zygo Blaxell
2014-10-24 19:58                   ` Rich Freeman
2014-10-22 16:15     ` Chris Murphy
2014-10-23  2:44       ` Duncan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54479379.2000502@gmail.com \
    --to=ahferroin7@gmail.com \
    --cc=kapp.arno@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.