From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH for-4.5 v3] Xen and tools: Fix listing of vcpus when domains lacking any vcpus exist Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:27:02 +0100 Message-ID: <5447DAD6.1090802@citrix.com> References: <1413910014-4249-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> <1413994723.17454.10.camel@Abyss> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1413994723.17454.10.camel@Abyss> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Dario Faggioli Cc: Keir Fraser , Ian Campbell , Ian Jackson , Xen-devel , Euan Harris , Jan Beulich , Wei Liu List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 22/10/14 17:18, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 17:46 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > >> As part of this change, remove the pointless call to libxl_get_max_cpus(), >> whose returned value is unconditionally clobbered in the for() loop. >> > Is it? You mind pointing me at where? You are entirely correct. There is an important 'v' difference in variable name. ~Andrew