From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1XhCN9-0006A5-Ff for mharc-qemu-trivial@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 02:59:47 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35811) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XhCN1-0005ym-L8 for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 02:59:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XhCMv-0007rg-BB for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 02:59:39 -0400 Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([86.62.121.231]:40808) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XhCMi-0007pa-Ql; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 02:59:20 -0400 Received: from [192.168.88.2] (mjt.vpn.tls.msk.ru [192.168.177.99]) by isrv.corpit.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC50345ABF; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:59:19 +0400 (MSK) Message-ID: <5448A747.30208@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:59:19 +0400 From: Michael Tokarev Organization: Telecom Service, JSC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zhang Haoyu , qemu-devel References: <201410222039495960337@sangfor.com> In-Reply-To: <201410222039495960337@sangfor.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: id=804465C5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 86.62.121.231 Cc: qemu-trivial , Kevin Wolf , Stefan Hajnoczi , Max Reitz Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH v5] snapshot: use local variable to bdrv_pwrite_sync L1 table X-BeenThere: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 06:59:45 -0000 On 10/22/2014 04:39 PM, Zhang Haoyu wrote: > Use local variable to bdrv_pwrite_sync L1 table, > needless to make conversion of cached L1 table between > big-endian and host style. ... Okay, so, why do you think that a patch which prompted such a hot discussion and is at v5 already is applicable to -trivial to start with? Yes I know Max already took it, this is a rhetorical question ;) Thanks, /mjt From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35792) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XhCMp-0005rk-66 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 02:59:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XhCMj-0007pj-1Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 02:59:27 -0400 Message-ID: <5448A747.30208@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:59:19 +0400 From: Michael Tokarev MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201410222039495960337@sangfor.com> In-Reply-To: <201410222039495960337@sangfor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH v5] snapshot: use local variable to bdrv_pwrite_sync L1 table List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Zhang Haoyu , qemu-devel Cc: qemu-trivial , Kevin Wolf , Stefan Hajnoczi , Max Reitz On 10/22/2014 04:39 PM, Zhang Haoyu wrote: > Use local variable to bdrv_pwrite_sync L1 table, > needless to make conversion of cached L1 table between > big-endian and host style. ... Okay, so, why do you think that a patch which prompted such a hot discussion and is at v5 already is applicable to -trivial to start with? Yes I know Max already took it, this is a rhetorical question ;) Thanks, /mjt