From: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com>
To: dsterba@suse.cz, Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Petr Janecek <janecek@ucw.cz>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Btrfs-progs release 3.17
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:13:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5448B8A5.2010202@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141023065709.GA11511@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Some of the disks on my system were missing and I was able to hit
this issue.
----------------
Check tree block failed, want=12582912, have=0
read block failed check_tree_block
Couldn't read chunk root
warning devid 2 not found already
Check tree block failed, want=143360, have=0
read block failed check_tree_block
Couldn't read chunk root
warning, device 4 is missing
warning, device 3 is missing
warning, device 2 is missing
warning, device 1 is missing
----------------
Did a bisect and it leads to this following patch.
----------------
commit 915902c5002485fb13d27c4b699a73fb66cc0f09
btrfs-progs: fix device missing of btrfs fi show with seed devices
----------------
Also this patch stalls ~2sec in the cmd btrfs fi show, on my system
with 48 disks.
Also a simple test case hits some warnings...
----------------
mkfs.btrfs -draid1 -mraid1 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc
mount /dev/sdb /btrfs && fillfs /btrfs 100 && umount /btrfs
wipefs -a /dev/sdb
modprobe -r btrfs && modprobe btrfs
mount -o degraded /dev/sdb /btrfs
btrfs fi show
Label: none uuid: 9844cd05-1c8c-473e-a84b-bac95aab7bc9
Total devices 2 FS bytes used 1.59MiB
devid 2 size 967.87MiB used 104.75MiB path /dev/sdc
*** Some devices missing
warning, device 1 is missing
warning, device 1 is missing
warning devid 1 not found already
----------------
On 10/23/14 14:57, Petr Janecek wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> You have mentioned two issues when balance and fi show running
>> concurrently
>
> my mail was a bit chaotic, but I get the stalls even on idle system.
> Today I got
>
> parent transid verify failed on 1559973888000 wanted 1819 found 1821
> parent transid verify failed on 1559973888000 wanted 1819 found 1821
> parent transid verify failed on 1559973888000 wanted 1819 found 1821
> parent transid verify failed on 1559973888000 wanted 1819 found 1821
> Ignoring transid failure
> leaf parent key incorrect 1559973888000
>
> from 'btrfs fi sh' while I was just copying something, no balance running.
>
> [...]
>> [PATCH 1/1] btrfs-progs: code optimize cmd_scan_dev() use
>> btrfs_register_one_device()
>> [PATCH 1/2] btrfs-progs: introduce btrfs_register_all_device()
>> [PATCH 2/2] btrfs-progs: optimize btrfs_scan_lblkid() for multiple calls
>>
>> If you could, pls..
>> Now on 3.17 apply above 3 patches and see if you see any better
>> performance for the stalling issue.
>
> no perceptible change: takes ~40 seconds both before and after
> applying. Old version <1 sec.
>
>> can you do same steps on 3.16 and report what you observe
>
> So many rejects -- do you have older versions of these patches?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Petr
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-23 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-21 21:28 Btrfs-progs release 3.17 Petr Janecek
2014-10-22 0:32 ` Petr Janecek
2014-10-22 8:49 ` Anand Jain
2014-10-23 6:57 ` Petr Janecek
2014-10-23 8:13 ` Anand Jain [this message]
2014-10-23 8:52 ` Gui Hecheng
2014-10-23 13:23 ` Petr Janecek
2014-10-28 3:56 ` Gui Hecheng
2014-10-23 13:36 ` Anand Jain
2014-10-28 4:03 ` Gui Hecheng
2014-10-28 8:42 ` Anand Jain
2014-10-28 9:43 ` Gui Hecheng
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-10-20 16:54 David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5448B8A5.2010202@oracle.com \
--to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=janecek@ucw.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.