From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] ASoC: Intel: Make ADSP memory block
 allocation more generic
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:26:34 +0300
Message-ID: <5449FF2A.9070200@linux.intel.com>
References: <1413814012-5619-1-git-send-email-liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>
 <20141021230224.GF2344@sirena.org.uk> <5449FE1B.9000201@linux.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>
Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88])
 by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B98B26049F
 for <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:26:37 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <5449FE1B.9000201@linux.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/options/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org

On 10/24/2014 10:22 AM, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> Hi Liam
>
> On 10/22/2014 02:02 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 03:06:46PM +0100, Liam Girdwood wrote:
>>> Current block allocation is tied to block type and requestor type. 
>>> Make the
>>> allocation more generic by removing the struct module parameter and 
>>> adding
>>> a generic block allocator structure. Also pass in the list that the 
>>> blocks
>>> have to be added too in order to remove dependence on block 
>>> requestor type.
>> I'm having trouble apply this - patch 1 manages to apply with some fuzz
>> but patch 5 is failing.  Probably needs refreshing against Vinod's
>> recent changes?  I applied everything up to patch 4 (ASoC: Intel: Add
>> runtime module support).
>
> For me sound.git for-next head a929d726a507 don't build anymore. I 
> have to revert all your four recent patches cd51c82524ff -4. I guess 
> some patch order or dependency issue since the first patch doesn't 
> build when applied to topic/intel?
>
Ah, nevermind. Mark was dropped these already. I was building at my 
local copy of for-next branch before patches were dropped.

-- 
Jarkko