Re: Functions prefixed with security_ in SELinux

[Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>]

On 10/25/2014 9:45 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
>> Would you consider patches that address this as part of the Multiple
>> LSM work? I wouldn't be doing the security server integration as that
>> would be outside the scope of the effort, but I consider the namespace
>> issue to be in scope. I won't bother if you aren't open to it.
> No, sadly I think a rename patch would need to be part of a larger
> cleanup/integration effort; otherwise it just looks like a lot of
> churn for minimal benefit.  I understand that is probably looks
> significant within the work you are doing to stack LSMs, but
> considering how rare/unique that work is, I don't think this is
> problem many people are likely to run into on a regular basis.

OK, I shan't worry about it. I suspect that I'm the only person
on the planet likely to be bothered especially much by it, and I
do have enough other kittens to fry.