All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: keir@xen.org, jbeulich@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: Disable REP MOVSD optimization if introspection is active
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:14:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <544E2904.4010204@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <544E27F3.2080703@bitdefender.com>

On 27/10/14 11:09, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
> On 10/27/2014 12:50 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 27/10/14 10:37, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
>>> REP MOVSD emulation is optimized to write several pages at once
>>> if possible. While this is a very good thing in general, it
>>> can interfere with a memory introspection application's ability
>>> to detect suspect behaviour, since it supresses potentially
>>> telling future page faults. This patch disables the optimization,
>>> gated on introspection being active for the domain.
>> An individual rep_movs() call should only optimise to within the current
>> page, then break back out to the emulator when passing the page boundary.
>>
>> How does this suppress pagefaults?
> You're right, sorry for the confusion. Indeed, although we do need (and
> have tested) the patch, its description is misleading (and wrong, as
> you've rigtly noticed).
>
> Rep_movs() does indeed optimise within the current page, however the
> introspection application looks at the EPT mem_event parameters in order
> to decide what to do, and the problem is that for the optimized cases
> only one mem_event is being sent (for the first MOV) with the initial
> gpa and gla. Then no more events are being sent for the rest of the
> operation in that page, which is confusing for a client application
> expecting to be called for each actual write to a protected page.
>
> If you feel that the patch is acceptable, I'll correct the description
> when submitting V2.

I feel that there is a reasonable argument to be made for disabling
optimisations like this in the case that you want mem_events for each step.

~Andrew

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-27 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-27 10:37 [PATCH] xen: Disable REP MOVSD optimization if introspection is active Razvan Cojocaru
2014-10-27 10:50 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-10-27 11:09   ` Razvan Cojocaru
2014-10-27 11:14     ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2014-10-27 13:01     ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-27 13:33       ` Razvan Cojocaru

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=544E2904.4010204@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=rcojocaru@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.