From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [v7][RFC][PATCH 01/13] introduce
	XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:22:42 +0800
Message-ID: <544EFDF2.5000303@intel.com>
References: <1414136077-18599-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com>
	<1414136077-18599-2-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com>
	<544A7A150200007800041FAC@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<544DA9C5.90506@intel.com>
	<544E21AA0200007800042540@mail.emea.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <544E21AA0200007800042540@mail.emea.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: yang.z.zhang@intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, tim@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 2014/10/27 17:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 27.10.14 at 03:11, <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>> On 2014/10/24 22:11, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 24.10.14 at 09:34, <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>>>> From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>>>>
>>>> This is a prerequisite for punching holes into HVM and PVH guests' P2M
>>>> to allow passing through devices that are associated with (on VT-d)
>>>> RMRRs.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
>>>
>>> I'm confused - you dropped Kevins ack and instead added you S-o-b
>>
>> I need to add this ACK.
>>
>>> despite you not having changed anything in the patch.
>>
>> The original you sent to me previously is needed to rebase on the
>> latest. Please check xen/include/public/memory.h.
>>
>> The original:
>>
>> --- a/xen/include/public/memory.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/public/memory.h
>> @@ -573,7 +573,29 @@ struct vnuma_topology_info {
>>    typedef struct vnuma_topology_info vnuma_topology_info_t;
>>    DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(vnuma_topology_info_t);
>>
>> -/* Next available subop number is 27 */
>>
>> Mine:
>>
>> --- a/xen/include/public/memory.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/public/memory.h
>> @@ -523,7 +523,29 @@ DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_mem_sharing_
>>
>>    #endif /* defined(__XEN__) || defined(__XEN_TOOLS__) */
>>
>> -/* Next available subop number is 26 */
>>
>> Unless you're saying this kind of rebase shouldn't introduce my SOB.
>
> I indeed don't think rebasing counts as you actively doing any
> changes.
>

Fine. I think this patch has a long history between us.

Thanks
Tiejun