From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: yang.z.zhang@intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, tim@xen.org,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [v7][RFC][PATCH 08/13] xen/x86/p2m: set p2m_access_n for reserved device memory mapping
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 16:20:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5450A330.6020102@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <544F7A310200007800042BAC@mail.emea.novell.com>
On 2014/10/28 18:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 28.10.14 at 09:26, <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>> On 2014/10/27 18:33, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 27.10.14 at 10:05, <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2014/10/24 23:11, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 24.10.14 at 09:34, <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>> + {
>>>>>> + /*
>>>>>> + * Just set p2m_access_n in case of shared-ept
>>>>>> + * or non-shared ept but 1:1 mapping.
>>>>>> + */
>>>>>> + if ( iommu_use_hap_pt(d) ||
>>>>>> + (!iommu_use_hap_pt(d) && mfn == gfn) )
>>>>>
>>>>> How would, other than by chance, mfn equal gfn here? Also the
>>>>> double use of iommu_use_hap_pt(d) is pointless here.
>>>>
>>>> There are two scenarios we should concern:
>>>>
>>>> #1 in case of shared-ept.
>>>>
>>>> We always need to check so iommu_use_hap_pt(d) is good.
>>>>
>>>> #2 in case of non-sharepd-ept
>>>>
>>>> If mfn != gfn I think guest don't access RMRR range, so its allowed.
>>>
>>> And what if subsequently a device needing a 1:1 mapping at this GFN
>>> gets assigned? (I simply don't see why shared vs non-shared would
>>> matter here.)
>>
>> In case of non-shared ept we just create VT-d table, if we assign a
>> device with 1:1 RMRR mapping. So as long as mfn != gfn, its not
>> necessary to set p2m_access_n.
>
> I think it was mentioned before (and not just by me) that it's at least
> risky to allow the two page tables to get out of sync wrt the
> translations they do (as opposed to permissions they set).
Okay I will remove all condition check here.
>
>>>>>> + {
>>>>>> + rc = p2m_set_entry(p2m, gfn, _mfn(mfn), page_order, t,
>>>>>> + p2m_access_n);
>>>>>> + if ( rc )
>>>>>> + gdprintk(XENLOG_WARNING, "set rdm p2m failed: (%#lx)\n",
>>>>>> + gfn);
>>>>>
>>>>> Such messages are (due to acting on a foreign domain) relatively
>>>>> useless without also logging the domain that is affected. Conversely,
>>>>> logging the current domain and vCPU (due to using gdprintk()) is
>>>>> rather pointless. Also please drop either the colon or the
>>>>> parentheses in the message.
>>>>
>>>> Can P2M_DEBUG work here?
>>>>
>>>> P2M_DEBUG("set rdm p2m failed: %#lx\n", gfn);
>>>
>>> I don't think this would magically add the missing information. Plus it
>>
>> Sorry, is it okay?
>>
>> gdprintk(XENLOG_WARNING, "Domain %hu set rdm p2m failed: %#lx\n",
>> d->domain_id, gfn);
>
> Almost. Use printk() instead of gdprintk(), and %d instead of %hu.
>
>>> would limit output to the !NDEBUG case, putting the practical
>>> usefulness of this under question even more.
>>>
>>> But anyway, looking at the existing code again, I think you'd be better
>>> off falling through to the p2m_set_entry() that's already there, just
>>
>> Are you saying I should do this in p2m_set_entry()?
>
> No. I said that I'd prefer you to use the _existing call to_
> p2m_set_entry().
>
>>> altering the access permission value you pass. Less code, better
>>
>> But here, guest_physmap_add_entry() just initiate to set p2m_access_n.
>> We will alter the access permission until if we really assign device to
>> create a 1:1 mapping.
>
> And I didn't question that. All I said is to use the existing call by simply
> replacing the unconditional use of the default access value with one
> conditionally set to p2m_access_n.
Okay,
@@ -686,8 +686,19 @@ guest_physmap_add_entry(struct domain *d, unsigned
long gfn,
/* Now, actually do the two-way mapping */
if ( mfn_valid(_mfn(mfn)) )
{
- rc = p2m_set_entry(p2m, gfn, _mfn(mfn), page_order, t,
- p2m->default_access);
+ rc = 0;
+ if ( !is_hardware_domain(d) )
+ {
+ rc =
iommu_get_reserved_device_memory(p2m_check_reserved_device_memory,
+ &gfn);
+ if ( rc < 0 )
+ printk("Domain %d can't can't check reserved device
memory.\n",
+ d->domain_id);
+ }
+
+ /* We need to set reserved device memory as p2m_access_n. */
+ a = ( rc == 1 ) ? p2m_access_n : p2m->default_access;
+ rc = p2m_set_entry(p2m, gfn, _mfn(mfn), page_order, t, a);
if ( rc )
goto out; /* Failed to update p2m, bail without updating
m2p. */
Thanks
Tiejun
>
> Jan
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-29 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 180+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-24 7:34 [v7][RFC][PATCH 01/13] xen: RMRR fix Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 7:34 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 01/13] introduce XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 14:11 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-27 2:11 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-27 2:18 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-27 9:42 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-28 2:22 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-27 13:35 ` Julien Grall
2014-10-28 2:35 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-28 10:36 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-29 0:40 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-29 8:53 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-30 2:53 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-30 9:10 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-31 1:03 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-24 7:34 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 02/13] tools/libxc: introduce hypercall for xc_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 7:34 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 03/13] tools/libxc: check if modules space is overlapping with reserved device memory Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 7:34 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 04/13] hvmloader/util: get reserved device memory maps Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 14:22 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-27 3:12 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-27 9:45 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-28 5:21 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-28 9:48 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-29 6:54 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-29 9:05 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-30 5:55 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-30 9:13 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-31 2:20 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-31 8:14 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-03 2:22 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-03 8:53 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-03 9:32 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-03 9:45 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-03 9:55 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-03 10:02 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-21 6:26 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-21 7:43 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-11-21 7:54 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-21 8:01 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-11-21 8:54 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-21 9:33 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-24 14:27 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-27 5:07 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-24 7:34 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 05/13] hvmloader/mmio: reconcile guest mmio with reserved device memory Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 14:42 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-27 7:12 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-27 9:56 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-28 7:11 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-28 9:56 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-29 7:03 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-29 9:08 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-30 3:18 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-24 7:34 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 06/13] hvmloader/ram: check if guest memory is out of reserved device memory maps Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 14:56 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-27 8:09 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-27 10:17 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-28 7:47 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-28 10:06 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-29 7:43 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-29 9:15 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-30 3:11 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-30 9:20 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-31 5:41 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-31 6:21 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-10-31 7:02 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-31 8:20 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-03 5:49 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-03 8:56 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-03 9:40 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-03 9:51 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-03 11:32 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-03 11:43 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-03 11:58 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-03 12:34 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-04 5:05 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-04 7:54 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-05 2:59 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-05 17:00 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-06 9:28 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-06 10:06 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-07 10:27 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-07 11:08 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-11 6:32 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-11 7:49 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-11 9:03 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-11 9:06 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-11 9:42 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-11 10:07 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-12 1:36 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-12 8:37 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-12 8:45 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-12 9:02 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-12 9:13 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-12 9:56 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-12 10:18 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-19 8:17 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-11-20 7:45 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-11-20 8:04 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-20 8:51 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-11-20 14:40 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-11-20 14:46 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-20 20:11 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 0:32 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-11-12 3:05 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-12 8:55 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-12 10:18 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-12 10:24 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-12 10:32 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-13 3:09 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-14 2:21 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-14 8:21 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-17 7:31 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-17 7:57 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-17 10:05 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-17 11:08 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-17 11:17 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-17 11:32 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-17 11:51 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-18 3:08 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-18 8:01 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-18 8:16 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-18 9:33 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-19 1:26 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-20 7:31 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-20 8:12 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-20 8:59 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-20 10:28 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-11 8:59 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-11 9:35 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-11 9:42 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-11 9:51 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-24 7:34 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 07/13] xen/x86/p2m: introduce p2m_check_reserved_device_memory Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 15:02 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-27 8:50 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-24 7:34 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 08/13] xen/x86/p2m: set p2m_access_n for reserved device memory mapping Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 15:11 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-27 9:05 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-27 10:33 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-28 8:26 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-28 10:12 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-29 8:20 ` Chen, Tiejun [this message]
2014-10-29 9:20 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-30 7:39 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-30 9:24 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-31 2:50 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-31 8:25 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-03 6:20 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-03 9:00 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-03 9:51 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-03 10:03 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-03 11:48 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-03 11:53 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-04 1:35 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-04 8:02 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-04 10:41 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-04 11:41 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-04 11:51 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-24 7:34 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 09/13] xen/x86/ept: handle reserved device memory in ept_handle_violation Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 7:34 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 10/13] xen/x86/p2m: introduce set_identity_p2m_entry Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 7:34 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 11/13] xen:vtd: create RMRR mapping Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 7:34 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 12/13] xen/vtd: re-enable USB device assignment Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 7:34 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 13/13] xen/vtd: group assigned device with RMRR Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 10:52 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 01/13] xen: RMRR fix Jan Beulich
2014-10-27 2:00 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-27 9:41 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-28 8:36 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-28 9:34 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-28 9:39 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2014-10-29 0:51 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-29 0:48 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-29 2:51 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-29 8:45 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-30 8:21 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-30 9:07 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-31 3:11 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-29 8:44 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-30 2:51 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-30 22:15 ` Tim Deegan
2014-10-31 2:53 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-31 9:10 ` Tim Deegan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5450A330.6020102@intel.com \
--to=tiejun.chen@intel.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
--cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.