From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: Add a chapter on conditional compilation
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:35:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <545187B6.1090704@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdV2Z0+gon8+LP_7X2h4B4Hb3KAV2vpZ9kRwC2mVFGLWXw@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/29/14 12:12, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> wrote:
>> Document several common practices and conventions regarding conditional
>> compilation, most notably the preference for ifdefs in headers rather
>> than .c files.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
>
>> +If you have a function or variable which may potentially go unused in a
>> +particular configuration, and the compiler would warn about its definition
>> +going unused, mark the definition as __maybe_unused rather than wrapping it in
>> +a preprocessor conditional. (However, if a function or variable *always* goes
>> +unused, delete it.)
>
> Personally, I don't like __maybe_unused. Once it's there, the compiler
> will stop warning about it, even if it really becomes unused.
>
> Apart from that:
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Is the compiler smart enough to delete (discard) the code or data instance
if it is unused or is the code or data actually wasting space?
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-30 0:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-29 18:15 [PATCH] CodingStyle: Add a chapter on conditional compilation Josh Triplett
2014-10-29 19:12 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-10-29 22:20 ` Josh Triplett
2014-10-30 0:35 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2014-10-30 2:24 ` Josh Triplett
2014-10-30 3:33 ` Martin Kelly
2014-11-03 16:46 ` Jonathan Corbet
2014-11-03 17:47 ` Joe Perches
2014-11-03 18:05 ` Josh Triplett
2014-11-03 18:39 ` Joe Perches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=545187B6.1090704@infradead.org \
--to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.