From: Zack Coffey <tech42.clickwir@gmail.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID1 fails to recover chunk tree
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 09:30:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54523D86.5040906@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54517338.7090606@pobox.com>
Rob, That second drive was immediately put to use elsewhere. I figured
having only the metadata on that drive, it wouldn't matter. The data
stayed single and wasn't part of the second drive, only the metadata
was. I must not be capable of understanding why that wouldn't work.
I thought all I was doing was removing a duplication of metadata and the
worst I would see is a message complaining about a drive missing. Never
thought the data or access to it could be compromised in what seemed to
be a simple situation.
Anand, I get the same output with mount -o recovery,ro.
On 10/29/2014 7:07 PM, Robert White wrote:
> On 10/29/2014 03:26 PM, Robert White wrote:
>> On 10/28/2014 01:32 PM, Zack Coffey wrote:
>>> Made a RAID1 with another drive of just the metadata. Was in
>>> that state for less than 12 hours-ish, removed the second drive and
>>> now cannot get to any data on the original drive. Data remained single
>>> while only metadata was RAID1.
>>
>> I don't know all the details but I would _never_ suspect the action you
>> described to _not_ hose up the file system.
>> You need to put the second drive back in and then coerce all the data
>> back to the first drive. "btrfs device delete" is what you want. You
>> _may_ need to switch the metadata back to "single" before the delete.
>>
>> --Rob.
>>
>
> P.S. I am/was assuming you said "removed the second drive" in the
> normal sense of disconnecting and removing, as opposed to the semantic
> action of deleting the device element.
>
> If you did do the btrfs delete, you might have needed to do a "btrfs
> filesystem sync" to make sure that all the transactions involved in
> the delete were finished and flushed to disk.
>
> Either way, physically reattaching "the second drive" is your first
> step; presuming again that you haven't destroyed the partition or
> re-used the drive etc. If the partition will mount once the second
> drive is in place, do the delete operation (if you didn't) and then
> the sync (to make sure that everything has finished migrating etc).
> Then you should be able to re-remove the physical drive.
>
> If you already did the delete and sync as part of what you meant by
> "remove" then sorry for the interruption of your misery. 8-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-30 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-28 20:32 RAID1 fails to recover chunk tree Zack Coffey
2014-10-29 3:55 ` Anand Jain
2014-10-29 19:32 ` Zack Coffey
2014-10-30 3:33 ` Anand Jain
2014-10-29 22:26 ` Robert White
2014-10-29 23:07 ` Robert White
2014-10-30 13:30 ` Zack Coffey [this message]
2014-10-30 15:23 ` Zygo Blaxell
2014-10-30 18:04 ` Chris Murphy
2014-10-31 1:27 ` Duncan
2014-10-31 2:09 ` Chris Murphy
2014-11-02 4:26 ` Robert White
2014-11-02 8:48 ` Roman Mamedov
2014-11-02 11:08 ` Robert White
2014-11-03 6:52 ` Duncan
2014-11-03 8:00 ` Duncan
2014-10-31 8:35 ` Robert White
2014-10-31 12:15 ` Zack Coffey
2014-11-02 4:19 ` Robert White
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-10-28 20:18 Zack Coffey
2014-10-27 19:01 Zack Coffey
2014-10-15 21:09 Zack Coffey
2014-10-15 15:42 Zack Coffey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54523D86.5040906@gmail.com \
--to=tech42.clickwir@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.