From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Chaloupka Subject: statfs.2: f_spare[4] or f_spare[5] Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 22:26:07 +0100 Message-ID: <5453FE6F.3010501@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Sender: linux-man-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org >> Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Cc: linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Hello, there is probably a wrong number in description of statfs structure. In description section, struct statfs contains as a last field f_spare[5]. But the /usr/include/bits/statfs.h itself contains f_spare[4] (glibc-headers-2.18 on f20). Looking into glibc-2.20, there is f_spare[6]. Looks like the structure is gradually evolving :). Inspecting upstream history (gitk statfs.h), it shows it was f_spare[6] since 1997. Regards Jan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html