Re: L3.10.17_1.0.2 Release ABI changes

[Eric Nelson <eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com>]

Thanks Lauren,

On 10/31/2014 12:10 PM, Lauren Post wrote:
>
> In this case I would keep kernel and graphics together as this is
> primarily a graphics update (half the patches in kernel are for graphics
> driver updates.
> 
> Lauren
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: meta-freescale-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-freescale-bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Eric Nelson
> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 10:56 AM
> To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
> Subject: [meta-freescale] L3.10.17_1.0.2 Release ABI changes
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I just downloaded the release notes for the L3.10.17_1.0.2 kernel release:
> 	https://community.freescale.com/docs/DOC-102677
> 
> The kernel patches are easy to identify, and rebasing our 3.10.17_1.0.1_ga branch on top of them was pretty trivial.
> 
> The documentation (file i.MX_6_Yocto_Project_Patch_Release.pdf)
> refers to updates to updates though:
> 
> 	• Graphics: gpu-viv-bin-mx6q, 3.10.17_1.0.2
> 	• Graphics: gpu-viv-g2d, 3.10.17_1.0.2
> 	• Graphics: Xorg-driver, 3.10.17_1.0.2
> 
> A quick scan of the kernel patches doesn't show any obvious ABI changes, but since some bits are only accessible through the closed-source libraries, it's hard to tell.
> 
> In particular, it's not clear whether the changes (additions) to enum _gcePATCH_ID require a simultaneous kernel/library update.
> 
> If so, then I'm not sure how/when to push an update to meta-fsl-arm-extra for our kernel, since it will need to be coordinated with meta-fsl-arm/recipes-graphics (and probably other vendor kernels).
> 

FWIW, the GPU appears to operate normally with the 3.10.17_1.0.2
kernel updates and **without** the updates to gpu-viv-bin-mx6q,
gpu-viv-g2d, and xf86-video-imxfb-vivante.

Regards,


Eric