>> Would it be acceptable to integrate a tool like "AspectC++" into the build
>> process for your software?
>> http://aspectc.org/
> 
> I think it would be a severe mistake - even if AspectC++ is an excellent tool
> it is a tool that almost nobody (well, save for you) knows about and so I
> would say it adds a big cost to contributing to the project.

Thanks for your feedback.

How are the chances to delegate more software maintenance tasks to dedicated
development tools?


> So, why would you want it?

Would you like to build programs that are more flexible and secure together?

Do you want to achieve benefits from the aspect design dimension?


> Convince us!

I try that again. I hope that you like to consider a few improved approaches.

How do you think about to improve static source code analysis also for your
software?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tools_for_static_code_analysis#C.2FC.2B.2B

Do you find information sources like the following useful?
* Article "A Reusable Aspect for Memory Allocation Checking"
  http://aspectc.net/ac_tutorial.html#reusablemachecking

* Document "Aspect-Oriented Software Development - An Introduction"
  by Johan Brichau and Theo D'Hondt
  http://www.info.ucl.ac.be/~jbrichau/courses/introductionToAOSD.pdf

* Paper "On Typesafe Aspect Implementations in C++"
  by Daniel Lohmann and Olaf Spinczyk
  http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.125.2164

Regards,
Markus