From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6143044160084705737==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: SF Markus Elfring Subject: Re: [Powertop] Completion of error handling Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 13:00:26 +0100 Message-ID: <5454CB5A.5070309@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: 20141101105251.GA31366@sara.bahnhof.se To: powertop@lists.01.org List-ID: --===============6143044160084705737== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >> Would it be acceptable to integrate a tool like "AspectC++" into the bui= ld >> process for your software? >> http://aspectc.org/ > = > I think it would be a severe mistake - even if AspectC++ is an excellent = tool > it is a tool that almost nobody (well, save for you) knows about and so I > would say it adds a big cost to contributing to the project. Thanks for your feedback. How are the chances to delegate more software maintenance tasks to dedicated development tools? > So, why would you want it? Would you like to build programs that are more flexible and secure together? Do you want to achieve benefits from the aspect design dimension? > Convince us! I try that again. I hope that you like to consider a few improved approache= s. How do you think about to improve static source code analysis also for your software? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tools_for_static_code_analysis#C.2FC.= 2B.2B Do you find information sources like the following useful? * Article "A Reusable Aspect for Memory Allocation Checking" http://aspectc.net/ac_tutorial.html#reusablemachecking * Document "Aspect-Oriented Software Development - An Introduction" by Johan Brichau and Theo D'Hondt http://www.info.ucl.ac.be/~jbrichau/courses/introductionToAOSD.pdf * Paper "On Typesafe Aspect Implementations in C++" by Daniel Lohmann and Olaf Spinczyk http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=3D10.1.1.125.2164 Regards, Markus --===============6143044160084705737==--