From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@rempel-privat.de (Oleksij Rempel) Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 07:51:42 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v8 0/9] initial suport for Alphascale ASM9260 In-Reply-To: <20141102021123.GQ3698@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <1413888020-8790-1-git-send-email-linux@rempel-privat.de> <544D0786.2070401@rempel-privat.de> <20141102021123.GQ3698@titan.lakedaemon.net> Message-ID: <5455D47E.4020904@rempel-privat.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Am 02.11.2014 um 03:11 schrieb Jason Cooper: > On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 03:39:02PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: >> Will it be better to split this patch set? >> >> For example: >> part 1 >>> ARM: add mach-asm9260 >>> ARM: add lolevel debug support for asm9260 >> part2 >>> ARM: irqchip: mxs: prepare driver for HW with different offsets >>> ARM: irqchip: mxs: add Alpascale ASM9260 support >> and all other patches separately. >> >> this will reduce review time for you and give some hope for me :D > > I honestly prefer to keep the series together. The subject lines make > it clear which parts I need to worry about merging. The big thing is > if there are compile-time dependencies between the different subsystems. > It doesn't look like there are, but if so, just bring it to our > attention. Ok, i'll resend updated version against latest arm-soc/for-next.git, or should i take other branch? -- Regards, Oleksij -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 213 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: