From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Weinberger Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/5 v2] mtd:ubi: Read disturb and Data retention handling Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 18:02:14 +0100 Message-ID: <54566396.1050209@nod.at> References: <1414331342-27839-1-git-send-email-tlinder@codeaurora.org> <544D5BEC.50802@nod.at> <544E052B.1040505@codeaurora.org> <544E08AE.7080506@nod.at> <5450C997.9010205@codeaurora.org> <5450D6C4.4040400@nod.at> <54538ABC.1040605@codeaurora.org> <5453ABF9.4070208@nod.at> <54563059.1080405@codeaurora.org> <545637AA.7080906@nod.at> <54563BD4.7050107@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143]:65275 "EHLO radon.swed.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751949AbaKBRCS (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Nov 2014 12:02:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <54563BD4.7050107@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Tanya Brokhman , dedekind1@gmail.com Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Am 02.11.2014 um 15:12 schrieb Tanya Brokhman: >> Back to topic. >> Storing the read-counters into fastmap also not a good idea because the fastmap can get lost completely (by design). > > yes,I'm aware of that. We have a default value for that case, and we're trying to avoid fastmap being invalid... Here be dragons. Can you please share these modifications? Thanks, //richard