From: Wido den Hollander <wido@42on.com>
To: ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: inode64 mount option for XFS
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 13:28:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <545774FA.2070102@42on.com> (raw)
Hi,
While look at init-ceph and ceph-disk I noticed a discrepancy between them.
init-ceph mounts XFS filesystems with rw,noatime,inode64, but
ceph-disk(-active) with rw,noatime
As inode64 gives the best performance, shouldn't ceph-disk do the same?
Any implications if we add inode64 on running deployments?
--
Wido den Hollander
42on B.V.
Ceph trainer and consultant
Phone: +31 (0)20 700 9902
Skype: contact42on
next reply other threads:[~2014-11-03 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-03 12:28 Wido den Hollander [this message]
2014-11-03 12:34 ` inode64 mount option for XFS Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2014-11-03 12:38 ` Wido den Hollander
2014-11-03 14:20 ` Sage Weil
2014-11-03 14:32 ` Wido den Hollander
2014-11-05 13:01 ` Sage Weil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=545774FA.2070102@42on.com \
--to=wido@42on.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.