From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: move hvmloader to x86 Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 10:47:10 +0000 Message-ID: <5458AEAE.9080804@citrix.com> References: <5458BBF30200007800044B69@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Xlbdr-0005W1-K8 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 10:47:15 +0000 In-Reply-To: <5458BBF30200007800044B69@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich , xen-devel Cc: Ian Campbell , Ian Jackson , Keir Fraser , Tim Deegan List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 04/11/14 10:43, Jan Beulich wrote: > ... as being more like a hypervisor extension into the guest than a > part of the tool stack. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich I think this is a very sensible idea, but... > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ S: Supported > L: xen-devel@lists.xen.org > F: xen/arch/x86/ > F: xen/include/asm-x86/ > +F: tools/firmware/hvmloader/ hvmloader as a binary is linked together with other bits in tools/firmware, which form part of the x86 HVM boot path. As a result, I would recommend this path being "tools/firmware/" to include these other bits in being part of the x86 architecture code. ~Andrew > > X86 MEMORY MANAGEMENT > M: Tim Deegan > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel