From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 for 4.5] xen/arm: Add support for GICv3 for domU Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 17:26:32 +0000 Message-ID: <54590C48.4080100@linaro.org> References: <1414872625-2961-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org> <20141103163904.GF1638@laptop.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XlhsZ-0003MP-6h for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 17:26:51 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id bs8so10083724wib.11 for ; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 09:26:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20141103163904.GF1638@laptop.dumpdata.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Ian Campbell , Jan Beulich , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: Wei Liu , Vijay Kilari , Stefano Stabellini , Ian Jackson , Vijaya Kumar K , Tim Deegan , Stefano Stabellini , Daniel De Graaf List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hi Konrad, On 11/03/2014 04:39 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 06:07:33PM +0530, Vijay Kilari wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Stefano Stabellini >> wrote: >>> On Sat, 1 Nov 2014, Julien Grall wrote: >>>> The vGIC will emulate the same version as the hardware. The toolstack has >>>> to retrieve the version of the vGIC in order to be able to create the >>>> corresponding device tree node. >>>> >>>> A new DOMCTL has been introduced for ARM to configure the domain. For now >>>> it only allow the toolstack to retrieve the version of vGIC. >>>> This DOMCTL will be extend later to let the user choose the version of the >>>> emulated GIC. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Vijaya Kumar K >>>> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall >>>> Cc: Ian Jackson >>>> Cc: Jan Beulich >>>> Cc: Daniel De Graaf >>>> Cc: Wei Liu >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini >> >> Tested with GICv3 platform. > > Thank you for doing that. > > It also needs Acks from Daniel and Jan. This patch doesn't modify the x86 part. So I'm not sure if Jan ack is required. Would Ian C. ack be enough? Anyway, Jan do you have any objection on this patch? Regards, -- Julien Grall