From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Consul Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 01:38:01 +0100 Message-ID: <54597169.2040006@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ibBl8kjkf5aIpILBPrKlg0X2r4lj7KWOb" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:59269 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751506AbaKEAiI (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Nov 2014 19:38:08 -0500 Received: from [10.9.0.6] (unknown [10.0.2.28]) by smtp.dmail.dachary.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D008420A8 for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 01:38:01 +0100 (CET) Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --ibBl8kjkf5aIpILBPrKlg0X2r4lj7KWOb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ceph, While at the OpenStack summit Dan Bode spoke highly of Consul ( https://c= onsul.io/intro/index.html ). Its scope is new to me. Each individual feat= ure is familiar but I'm not entirely sure if combining them into a single= software is necessary. And I wonder how it could relate to Ceph. It is e= ntirely possible that it does not even make sense to ask theses questions= ;-) Cheers --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --ibBl8kjkf5aIpILBPrKlg0X2r4lj7KWOb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlRZcWkACgkQ8dLMyEl6F23n9wCcDZgKcQc07VOBM9zd3mydvVxY Z7MAoJ9QtZyH76BmjWaDvkEkCUmpsYMG =5lc4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ibBl8kjkf5aIpILBPrKlg0X2r4lj7KWOb--