All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ChenQi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
To: Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] libpam: add system-auth in case of systemd
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 12:47:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5459ABE1.8030000@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5119E558-0182-4F53-80DC-F4E62FA2E42A@dominion.thruhere.net>

On 10/31/2014 03:22 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Op 31 okt. 2014, om 03:59 heeft ChenQi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com> het volgende geschreven:
>>
>> On 10/30/2014 09:27 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>>> Op 30 okt. 2014, om 10:08 heeft Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com> het volgende geschreven:
>>>>
>>>> systemd needs this file to be there because one of its configuration file
>>>> in pam.d, systemd-user, requires it. Otherwise, we would have errors like
>>>> below.
>>>>
>>>>     systemd: PAM _pam_load_conf_file: unable to open /etc/pam.d/system-auth
>>> Isn't it the same as 'common-auth'? ISTR this is due to debian vs fedora naming of PAM stuff. I think it would make more sense to check what systemd actually wants and then see if a symlink to common-auth or patching systemd to use common-auth is the right answer instead of blindly adding system-auth.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>>
>>> Koen
>>>
>> Hi Koen,
>>
>> An alternative is to patch systemd's source code to change the systemd-user configuration file.
>>
>> In fact, I have seen patches in OE whose purpose is merely changing 'system-auth' to 'common-auth' in the pam configuration files of the packages.
>>
>> So we have two options here:
>> 1. Provide system-auth
>> 2. Patch packages that make use of system-auth and maintain those patches.
>>
>> I think solution 1 is more reasonable but if you and other people in community think that solution 2 can bring us more benefits, I can send out a patch using solution 2.
> Solution 1) introduces a new PAM file that seems to do the same as one of the common-<foo> files we have. So from a reuse and maintainability standpoint 2) would be better.
>
> regards,
>
> Koen
>

Hi Koen,

I've sent out a new patch.
[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] systemd: avoid using system-auth

Best Regards,
Chen Qi

>
>> Best Regards,
>> Chen Qi
>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam/pam.d/system-auth | 12 ++++++++++++
>>>> meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam_1.1.6.bb          |  1 +
>>>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>>> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam/pam.d/system-auth
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam/pam.d/system-auth b/meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam/pam.d/system-auth
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..ffb08ab
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam/pam.d/system-auth
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
>>>> +# This file comes from systemd.
>>>> +
>>>> +auth     sufficient pam_unix.so nullok try_first_pass
>>>> +
>>>> +account  required   pam_nologin.so
>>>> +account  sufficient pam_unix.so
>>>> +
>>>> +password sufficient pam_unix.so nullok sha512 shadow try_first_pass try_authtok
>>>> +
>>>> +-session optional   pam_loginuid.so
>>>> +-session optional   pam_systemd.so
>>>> +session  sufficient pam_unix.so
>>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam_1.1.6.bb b/meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam_1.1.6.bb
>>>> index a84e51e..0910b6f 100644
>>>> --- a/meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam_1.1.6.bb
>>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam_1.1.6.bb
>>>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ SRC_URI = "http://linux-pam.org/library/Linux-PAM-${PV}.tar.bz2 \
>>>>             file://pam.d/common-session \
>>>>             file://pam.d/common-session-noninteractive \
>>>>             file://pam.d/other \
>>>> +           ${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'systemd', 'file://pam.d/system-auth', '', d)} \
>>>>             file://libpam-xtests.patch \
>>>>             file://destdirfix.patch \
>>>>             file://fixsepbuild.patch \
>>>> -- 
>>>> 1.9.1
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>>>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>>>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>>>
>>
>



      reply	other threads:[~2014-11-05  4:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-30  9:08 [PATCH 0/1] libpam: add system-auth in case of systemd Chen Qi
2014-10-30  9:08 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Chen Qi
2014-10-30 13:27   ` Koen Kooi
2014-10-31  2:59     ` ChenQi
2014-10-31  3:04       ` ChenQi
2014-10-31  7:22       ` Koen Kooi
2014-11-05  4:47         ` ChenQi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5459ABE1.8030000@windriver.com \
    --to=qi.chen@windriver.com \
    --cc=koen@dominion.thruhere.net \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.