From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hannes Reinecke Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] scsi: stop passing a gfp_mask argument down the command setup path Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 09:24:19 +0100 Message-ID: <545B3033.6070406@suse.de> References: <1415259630-20784-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1415259630-20784-5-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:41704 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751623AbaKFIYU (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2014 03:24:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1415259630-20784-5-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Cc: Bart Van Assche On 11/06/2014 08:40 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > There is no reason for ULDs to pass in a flag on how to allocate the = S/G > lists. While we don't need GFP_ATOMIC for the blk-mq case because we > don't hold locks, that decision can be made way down the chain withou= t > having to pass a pointless gfp_mask argument. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke Cheers, Hannes --=20 Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imend=F6rffer, HRB 21284 (AG N=FCrnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html