From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Ceph & Cinder & HA Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 16:57:07 +0100 Message-ID: <545B9A53.4040502@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cW8WXNBbhxoqf3HQNQBjJluCSEL8bXh48" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:60396 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750970AbaKFP5Q (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2014 10:57:16 -0500 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Florian Haas Cc: "@@redhat.com"@dachary.org, "Ceph Development \"" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --cW8WXNBbhxoqf3HQNQBjJluCSEL8bXh48 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Florian, I attended the Ceph & Cinder & HA session today at the summit. I've never= really thought about strategies to implement HA and how Ceph can help. T= he extent of my knowledge on this topic is to make sure I do not confuse = something that is "highly reliable" with something "highly available" ;-)= Guilio came to me after the session and I had to confess my ignorance on = the topic of HA. Hence this mail and the hope that you can shed some ligh= t on this topic. Cheers --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --cW8WXNBbhxoqf3HQNQBjJluCSEL8bXh48 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlRbmlMACgkQ8dLMyEl6F21MJACZAU3dHUXnYYhB/pWFNEvu+Lrh BlYAn0FrHyhegZAAySWMI/iSt8UK4rme =tLaD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cW8WXNBbhxoqf3HQNQBjJluCSEL8bXh48--