Re: What image should I build on the SabreLite?

[Eric Nelson <eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com>]

Hi Philippe,

On 11/06/2014 11:11 AM, Eric Nelson wrote:
> Hi Philippe,
> 
> <snip>
> 
> While building from dizzy, I grabbed the latest 'fsl-machine-test'
> from O.S.Systems CI server (master branch):
> 
> 	http://ci.ossystems.com.br/public/fsl-community-bsp/master/389/x11/nitrogen6x/fsl-image-machine-test-nitrogen6x-20141102-389.rootfs.sdcard
> 
> This image has the same kernel version (g9f710da) as the head of
> dizzy, and it came right up.
> 
> 	root@nitrogen6x:~# cat /proc/version
> 	Linux version 3.10.17-1.0.1_ga+yocto+g9f710da (jenkins@builder) (gcc
> version 4.9.1 (GCC) ) #1 SMP Sun Nov 2 13:37:00 UTC 2014
> 	root@nitrogen6x:~# dmesg | grep ov5642
> 	mxc_v4l2_master_attach: ipu0:/csi0 parallel attached ov5642:mxc_v4l2_cap0
> 	ov5642 1-003d: created sysfs entry for reading regs
> 	camera ov5642 is found
> 
> I did see some weirdness in the mode setting of /dev/fb0, but the
> camera was functional, and I tested with a minimal gst-launch
> command-line:
> 
> 	root@nitrogen6x:~# gst-launch mfw_v4lsrc ! mfw_v4lsink
> 

I just tested fsl-image-multimedia-full on the dizzy branch and
things look the same there (including the weirdness surrounding
the display resolution).

The camera was recognized and gst-launch functioned properly.

Regards,


Eric