Re: [Xenomai] rt_task_sleep_until() miss release point?

[ZIV-Alberto Ozalla Cantabrana <alberto.ozalla@cgglobal.com>]

On 06/11/14 21:22, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On 11/06/2014 05:46 PM, ZIV-Alberto Ozalla Cantabrana wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> These are the simplest examples:
>> There are no MSW for Test_Task.
>> The goal is to increment counter_ms each millisecond.
>>
>> Given that:
>> 1000000 nanoseconds = 24000 tsc.
>> 1 tsc = 41 ns
>>
> Is rt_timer_ns2tsc(1000000) actually returning 24000 on your platform?
> Yes.
>> void Test_Task(void *arg)
>> {
>>     rt_task_set_mode(0, 0, NULL);
> This is useless and not recommended. A newly created task always starts
> in primary mode.
>
> Ok. I will delete it.
>>      while (1) {
>>
>>              unsigned long long before = counter_ms;
>>              usleep(1000000);    // 1 second.
> Although this would rather cause higher count values, this non-rt main
> using a non-rt sleep service won't give you an accurate delay for the
> measurement.
>
> It is only an example.

-- 
Saludos,
Alberto Ozalla


CG DISCLAIMER: This email contains confidential information. It is intended exclusively for the addressees. If you are not an addressee, you must not store, transmit or disclose its contents. Instead please notify the sender immediately; and permanently delete this e-mail from your computer systems. We have taken reasonable precautions to ensure that no viruses are present. However, you must check this email and the attachments, for viruses. We accept no liability whatsoever, for any detriment caused by any transmitted virus.