From: Nikolay Dimitrov <picmaster@mail.bg>
To: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org"
<meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>,
Jon Nettleton <jon.nettleton@gmail.com>,
Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] arm: imx: fsl_otp: make fuses (OTP memory) read-only
Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 04:03:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <545D79DC.8030701@mail.bg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <545CF576.5050403@ahsoftware.de>
Hi Alexander,
The driver allows to be enabled/disabled by a configuration option, so
it's a responsibility of your engineering team to properly configure
the software for development, manufacturing and production purposes, as
there's no "one size fits all" solution for this option.
And I think it would be a unwise decision just to cripple the driver
because there is potential for misuse the driver. If so, we have to
disable also all device files and sysfs entries that allow raw access
to physical memory, physical disks, cpu frequency, thermal device,
power supply voltages, as all of these can screw-up the product (either
by deleting data or by frying a component on the board). And we have to
forbid kitchen knives :).
I like Eric's idea with sysfs unlock entry. It's also possible to have
different sysfs "read" and "write" files' permissions, to provide
privilege separation.
I also understand your confusion of the answers received on LKML and
here, but you should already know that each FOSS tribe has its own
customs. What's good for the kernel itself doesn't make it instantly
good for actual systems/product integration, so it's normal to have
groups with different goals to react differently on the same topic.
Kind regards,
Nikolay
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-08 2:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-07 9:43 [PATCH 0/1] arm: imx: fsl_otp: make fuses (OTP memory) read-only Alexander Holler
2014-11-07 9:43 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Alexander Holler
2014-11-07 11:34 ` Otavio Salvador
2014-11-07 14:40 ` Alexander Holler
2014-11-07 15:06 ` Otavio Salvador
2014-11-07 15:26 ` Alexander Holler
2014-11-07 14:00 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Eric Bénard
2014-11-07 14:31 ` Jon Nettleton
2014-11-07 14:55 ` Alexander Holler
2014-11-07 15:04 ` Eric Bénard
2014-11-07 15:07 ` Otavio Salvador
2014-11-07 15:23 ` Alexander Holler
2014-11-07 16:00 ` Otavio Salvador
2014-11-07 16:38 ` Alexander Holler
2014-11-08 2:03 ` Nikolay Dimitrov [this message]
2014-11-08 8:58 ` Chris Tapp
2014-11-08 9:32 ` Jon Nettleton
2014-11-08 18:49 ` Alexander Holler
2014-11-09 10:14 ` Alexander Holler
2014-11-09 15:09 ` Eric Bénard
2014-11-09 17:03 ` Bob Cochran
2014-11-09 12:34 ` Nikolay Dimitrov
2014-11-09 18:09 ` Alexander Holler
2014-11-09 19:20 ` Nikolay Dimitrov
2014-11-07 16:03 ` Eric Bénard
2014-11-07 15:50 ` Eric Bénard
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-11-08 21:54 Robin Findley
2014-11-10 14:11 ` Alexander Holler
2014-11-13 19:19 ` Alexander Holler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=545D79DC.8030701@mail.bg \
--to=picmaster@mail.bg \
--cc=holler@ahsoftware.de \
--cc=jon.nettleton@gmail.com \
--cc=meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org \
--cc=otavio@ossystems.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.