From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 3BBB1E008BA; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 13:13:55 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from smtp.webfaction.com (mail6.webfaction.com [74.55.86.74]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1090FE007C0 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 13:13:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (unknown [68.38.40.177]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8886C2078F06 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 21:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <545FD907.2070003@mindchasers.com> Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 16:13:43 -0500 From: Bob Cochran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yocto discussion list Subject: newbb.vim vs skeleton recipe in yocto-docs dev manual.... X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 21:13:55 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I just noticed that newbb.vim in bitbake/contrib is notably different from the skeleton recipe proposed in the latest Dev Manual. I'll submit a patch if someone can give me some guidance on what should be in newbb.vim (or maybe it's the manual that needs to be patched). Bob From yocto-docs: Dev Manual (modify the following skeleton recipe): SUMMARY = "" HOMEPAGE = "" LICENSE = "" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "" SRC_URI = "" SRC_URI[md5sum] = "" SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "" S = "${WORKDIR}/${PN}-${PV}" From newbb.vim: DESCRIPTION = "" HOMEPAGE = "" LICENSE = "" SECTION = "" DEPENDS = "" SRC_URI = ""