From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Giulio Fidente Subject: Re: Ceph & Cinder & HA Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:50:27 +0100 Message-ID: <5460A683.9040509@redhat.com> References: <545B9A53.4040502@dachary.org> <545C927E.9010807@redhat.com> <11F50ACF-55E9-4D2F-AD08-814FE5998089@enovance.com> <546098C5.4070709@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47275 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752108AbaKJLvk (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2014 06:51:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <546098C5.4070709@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Loic Dachary , Sebastien Han , justin@erenkrantz.com Cc: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" On 11/10/2014 11:51 AM, Loic Dachary wrote: > > > On 10/11/2014 11:34, Sebastien Han wrote: >> Indeed, that=E2=80=99s what we discussed with Giulio, using HAProxy = for the Monitors is a bit overkill since the client is natively able to= switch between different monitor source. >> >> Loic, maybe you can elaborate a bit more on the usage of HAProxy for= the monitors? > > Hi Sebastien, > > I can't elaborate because I know nothing about HAProxy (well, close t= o nothing ;-). I'd like to learn more about how HA (via HAProxy or some= thing else) can leverage Ceph in a meaningfull way thouhg, hence my int= erest for the topic. Thanks all for helping. Loic explained requests for the non-leader monitors go to the monitor=20 anyway in which case I understand it makes more sense to avoid the=20 complication of balancing the monitors. --=20 Giulio Fidente GPG KEY: 08D733BA -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html