From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] ARM: PSCI 0.1 vs 0.2
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:25:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5460BCE0.2020301@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5460B8E8.9070706@arm.com>
On 2014-11-10 14:08, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 10/11/14 12:51, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>> what is the motivation to expose a PSCI 0.1 interface in U-boot, instead
>> of 0.2? Support for preexisting users of 0.1? The kernel seems to be
>> happy with both, and I'm now wondering if we should actually add the
>> legacy version to Jailhouse as well (I hope we can avoid this).
>
> The initial rational was simple: at the time this code was written, the
> 0.2 spec still in review, and nobody was implementing it. Supporting 0.1
> was the only viable use-case.
>
>> Still studying the logic: Is it possible to provide both interfaces, and
>> would it make sense?
>
> Supporting both is very easy. Just output the 0.2 function numbers that
> actually make sense for 0.1 and have both compatible strings.
Ah, cool - parameters and return values of, say, CPU_ON/OFF are
compatible across both versions?
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-10 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-10 12:51 [U-Boot] ARM: PSCI 0.1 vs 0.2 Jan Kiszka
2014-11-10 13:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-11-10 13:25 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2014-11-10 13:29 ` bhupesh.sharma at freescale.com
2014-11-10 13:35 ` Jan Kiszka
2014-11-10 13:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-11-28 8:52 ` Jan Kiszka
2014-11-28 10:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-11-28 10:24 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5460BCE0.2020301@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.